Paper · 2007 · PubMed

Application of 1-methylcyclopropene reduces wound responses and maintains quality in fresh-cut apple.

Linchun Mao; Fujun Lu; Guoze Wang

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment before cutting on respiration rate, ethylene production, electrolyte leakage, firmness, and color in fresh-cut apple fruit. Fresh-cut apple without 1-MCP treatment had a shelf life of 10 days at 2 degrees C and became browning and decay after pro-long storage. However, fresh-cut apple remained fresh-looking even after 14 days at 2 degrees C when fruit were exposed to 1-MCP before cutting. 1-MCP treatment significantly reduced wound-activated respiration rate and ethylene production, maintained firmness during storage. Visible changes in apple skin color do not occur, however, .L and whiteness index (WI) of flesh in intact and fresh-cut apple applied with 1-MCP were higher than those without 1-MCP treatment. Fresh-cut and intact fruit had little changes in electrolyte leakage after 2 days of storage when 1-MCP was pre-applied. The present study indicated that treatment with 1 microL/L 1-MCP for 10 h at 20 degrees C prior to cutting can significantly reduce wound-active responses in fresh-cut apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treatment before cutting significantly reduced wound-activated respiration rate and ethylene production in fresh-cut apple.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
wound-activated respiration rate and ethylene productione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
without 1-MCP treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment significantly reduced wound-activated respiration rate and ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–587 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fresh-cut apple without 1-MCP treatment had a shelf life of 10 days at 2 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treatment before cutting maintained firmness of fresh-cut apple during storage.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
firmnesse2
Direction
maintainede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“1-MCP treatment significantly reduced wound-activated respiration rate and ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–587 · show in text ↑
e2

“maintained firmness during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh-cut apple pre-treated with 1-MCP remained fresh-looking for 14 days at 2 degrees C.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
fresh-lookinge1
Direction
remainede1
Value
14 dayse1
Comparator
without 1-MCP treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh-cut apple remained fresh-looking even after 14 days at 2 degrees C when fruit were exposed to 1-MCP before cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–491 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fresh-cut apple without 1-MCP treatment had a shelf life of 10 days at 2 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh-cut apple without 1-MCP treatment had a shelf life of 10 days at 2 degrees C.

Outcome
shelf lifee1
Value
10 dayse1
Qualifier
at 2 degrees Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh-cut apple without 1-MCP treatment had a shelf life of 10 days at 2 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visible changes in fresh-cut apple skin colour did not occur.

Outcome
Visible changes in apple skin colore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Visible changes in apple skin color do not occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 1-MCP, the lightness and whiteness index of apple flesh were higher than without 1-MCP.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
L and whiteness index (WI) of fleshe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
without 1-MCP treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“L and whiteness index (WI) of flesh in intact and fresh-cut apple applied with 1-MCP were higher than those without 1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 1-MCP pre-applied, electrolyte leakage of fresh-cut and intact apple changed little over 2 days of storage.

Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee1
Direction
little changese1
Qualifier
after 2 days of storagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fresh-cut apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh-cut and intact fruit had little changes in electrolyte leakage after 2 days of storage when 1-MCP was pre-applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–937 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: oxidative · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.