Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Biotechnology

In vitro regeneration from node and leaf explants of Jatropha curcas L. and evaluation of genetic fidelity through RAPD markers

Sunil Biswajit Maharana; Vivekananda Mahato; Motilal Behera; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
19
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plantlet regeneration in Jatropha curcas L. (Family: Euphorbiaceae), an energy shrub, has been studied from nodal and leaf explants on basal MS medium. The nodal explants were found superior to leaf explants. Higher shoot bud differentiation was observed on MS media supplemented with 8 mu M N-6-benzyladenine (BA; 6.2 +/- 0.83) from nodal explants in comparison to both 10 mu M kinetin (Kn; 2.8 +/- 0.45) from leaf explants and a combination of 6.0 mu M BA with 4.0 mu M Kn (5.0 +/- 0.71) from nodal explants. MS medium fortified with 8 mu M BA and 2 mu M IBA (indole butyric acid) was found most suitable for both callus mediated organogenesis and elongation of shoots. Addition of 45 mu M adenine sulphate, 15 mu M glutamine and 10 mu M proline to this optimized MS medium enhanced the number of multiple shoot proliferation (9.8 +/- 0.84) per explant and elongation at the end of 2nd wk. The elongated shoots were successfully rooted on half-strength MS medium with a prior incubation on MS medium with NAA (alpha-napthalene acetic acid) or IBA or a combination of both; 2 mu M IBA provided better response for rhizogenesis among them. Regenerated plantlets were successfully established in soil where 80 +/- 4% of them developed into morphologically normal and fertile plants. Forty RAPD decamer primers were used to assess genetic fidelity of regenerated plantlets along with the donor plant. Fourteen primers responded for amplification, generating 75 amplified products (160 to 2690 bp). The amplification pattern confirmed the genetic uniformity of the regenerated plantlets and substantiated the efficacy and suitability of this protocol for in vitro propagation of J. curcas, thereby favouring the economics of the cost of plant material and time factor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodal explants outperformed leaf explants for regeneration.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
nodal explantse0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
leaf explantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nodal explants were found superior to leaf explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–207 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodal explants on 8 mu M BA had higher shoot bud differentiation, 6.2 +/- 0.83.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
nodal explantse0
Treatment
8 mu M N-6-benzyladeninee0
Outcome
shoot bud differentiatione0
Direction
Highere0
Value
6.2 +/- 0.83e0
Comparator
10 mu M kinetine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher shoot bud differentiation was observed on MS media supplemented with 8 mu M N-6-benzyladenine (BA; 6.2 +/- 0.83) from nodal explants in comparison to both 10 mu M kinetin (Kn; 2.8 +/- 0.45) from leaf explants and a combination of 6.0 mu M BA with 4.0 mu M Kn (5.0 +/- 0.71) from nodal explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS medium with 8 mu M BA and 2 mu M IBA was most suitable for callus mediated organogenesis.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
8 mu M BA and 2 mu M IBAe0
Outcome
callus mediated organogenesise0
Direction
most suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MS medium fortified with 8 mu M BA and 2 mu M IBA (indole butyric acid) was found most suitable for both callus mediated organogenesis and elongation of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same medium was most suitable for shoot elongation.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
8 mu M BA and 2 mu M IBAe0
Outcome
elongation of shootse0
Direction
most suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MS medium fortified with 8 mu M BA and 2 mu M IBA (indole butyric acid) was found most suitable for both callus mediated organogenesis and elongation of shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adenine sulphate, glutamine, and proline supplementation enhanced multiple shoot proliferation to 9.8 +/- 0.84 per explant.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
45 mu M adenine sulphate, 15 mu M glutamine and 10 mu M prolinee0
Outcome
number of multiple shoot proliferatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
9.8 +/- 0.84e0
Comparator
this optimized MS mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 45 mu M adenine sulphate, 15 mu M glutamine and 10 mu M proline to this optimized MS medium enhanced the number of multiple shoot proliferation (9.8 +/- 0.84) per explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same supplementation enhanced shoot elongation by the end of week two.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
45 mu M adenine sulphate, 15 mu M glutamine and 10 mu M prolinee0
Outcome
elongatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
at the end of 2nd wke0
Comparator
this optimized MS mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 45 mu M adenine sulphate, 15 mu M glutamine and 10 mu M proline to this optimized MS medium enhanced the number of multiple shoot proliferation (9.8 +/- 0.84) per explant and elongation at the end of 2nd wk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 mu M IBA gave the better response for rhizogenesis.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
2 mu M IBAe0
Outcome
rhizogenesise0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2 mu M IBA provided better response for rhizogenesis among them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated plantlets established in soil, with 80 +/- 4% becoming morphologically normal and fertile.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Outcome
morphologically normal and fertile plantse0
Value
80 +/- 4%e0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regenerated plantlets were successfully established in soil where 80 +/- 4% of them developed into morphologically normal and fertile plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourteen RAPD primers amplified 75 products ranging from 160 to 2690 bp.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Outcome
amplified productse0
Value
75 amplified productse0
Qualifier
160 to 2690 bpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourteen primers responded for amplification, generating 75 amplified products (160 to 2690 bp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD amplification patterns confirmed genetic uniformity of regenerated plantlets.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Outcome
genetic uniformity of the regenerated plantletse0
Comparator
donor plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forty RAPD decamer primers were used to assess genetic fidelity of regenerated plantlets along with the donor plant. Fourteen primers responded for amplification, generating 75 amplified products (160 to 2690 bp). The amplification pattern confirmed the genetic uniformity of the regenerated plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑

proline · growth · Jatropha curcasResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

adenine · growth · Jatropha curcasResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfate · growth · Jatropha curcasResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

glutamine · growth · Jatropha curcasResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.