Paper · 2001 · Weed Science

Evaluation of rice by-products for weed control

Yong-In Kuk; Nilda R. Burgos; Ronald E. Talbert

15
claims
16
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice by-products were evaluated in the greenhouse for herbicidal activity on various weeds and crops. Rice by-products and corn gluten meal (CG) were applied at 0, 125, 250, 500, and 750 g m−2 preemergence (PRE) and preplant incorporated (PPI). The efficacy of rice by-products and CG in reducing weed emergence and shoot weight of broadleaf species was in the order of medium-grain fatty rice bran (MF) > long-grain fatty rice bran (LF) > CG > defatted rice bran (DF) > long-grain hull (LH) > medium-grain hull (MH). For reducing grass emergence, MF = CG > LF > DF > LH > MH, and for shoot weight reduction, CG > MF > LF > LH > DF = MH. Palmer amaranth and ivyleaf morningglory were the most susceptible weeds (91 and 82%) followed by sicklepod, hemp sesbania, and prickly sida (65 to 70%). Velvetleaf was the most tolerant broadleaf weed. Grasses were not as susceptible to rice bran as broadleaf weeds. In general, MF was the best material for reducing weed emergence and its efficacy was not affected by application method. Cotton and corn were the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF (6% reduction in plant stand), and soybean, Italian ryegrass, tomato, and rice had intermediate tolerances (30 to 86% stand reduction). Mustard, cucumber, and lettuce were the most susceptible crops (71 to 98% reduction in plant survival). The minimum effective rate was 250 g m−2 MF PPI or PRE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-grain fatty rice bran was the most effective material for reducing broadleaf weed emergence and shoot weight.

Treatment
medium-grain fatty rice brane0
Outcome
weed emergence and shoot weight of broadleaf speciese0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
long-grain fatty rice brane0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of rice by-products and CG in reducing weed emergence and shoot weight of broadleaf species was in the order of medium-grain fatty rice bran (MF) > long-grain fatty rice bran (LF) > CG > defatted rice bran (DF) > long-grain hull (LH) > medium-grain hull (MH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For grass emergence, medium-grain fatty rice bran and corn gluten meal ranked equally highest.

Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
grass emergencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
CGe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“For reducing grass emergence, MF = CG > LF > DF > LH > MH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn gluten meal ranked highest for grass shoot weight reduction.

Treatment
CGe0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
MFe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“for shoot weight reduction, CG > MF > LF > LH > DF = MH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–636 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth was the most susceptible weed, with 91% suppression.

Taxon
Palmer amaranthe0
Outcome
susceptible weedse0
Value
91e0

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth and ivyleaf morningglory were the most susceptible weeds (91 and 82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–723 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ivyleaf morningglory was highly susceptible, with 82% suppression.

Taxon
ivyleaf morninggloryIpomoea hederaceae0
Outcome
susceptible weedse0
Value
82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea hederacea
Ipomoea hederacea · TaxonUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth and ivyleaf morningglory were the most susceptible weeds (91 and 82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–723 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sicklepod, hemp sesbania and prickly sida had 65 to 70% susceptibility.

Taxon
sicklepod, hemp sesbania, and prickly sidae0
Outcome
sicklepod, hemp sesbania, and prickly sidae0
Value
65 to 70%e0

Verbatim

e0

“sicklepod, hemp sesbania, and prickly sida (65 to 70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetleaf was the most tolerant broadleaf weed.

Taxon
VelvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0
Outcome
most tolerant broadleaf weede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Velvetleaf was the most tolerant broadleaf weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grasses were less susceptible to rice bran than broadleaf weeds.

Taxon
Grassese0
Outcome
susceptible to rice brane0
Direction
not as susceptiblee0
Comparator
broadleaf weedse0

Verbatim

e0

“Grasses were not as susceptible to rice bran as broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-grain fatty rice bran was the best material for reducing weed emergence regardless of application method.

Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
weed emergencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
not affected by application methode0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“MF was the best material for reducing weed emergence and its efficacy was not affected by application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton was among the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF, with 6% stand reduction.

Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
plant stande0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton and corn were the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF (6% reduction in plant stand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn was among the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF, with 6% stand reduction.

Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
plant stande0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton and corn were the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF (6% reduction in plant stand)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean, Italian ryegrass and tomato had intermediate tolerance to MF, with 30 to 86% stand reduction.

Taxon
soybean, Italian ryegrass, tomatoGlycine maxSolanum lycopersicumLolium multiflorume0
Outcome
stande0
Direction
reductione0
Value
30 to 86%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean, Italian ryegrass, tomato, and rice had intermediate tolerances (30 to 86% stand reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice had intermediate tolerance to MF, with 30 to 86% stand reduction.

Treatment
MFe1
Outcome
stande0
Direction
reductione0
Value
30 to 86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean, Italian ryegrass, tomato, and rice had intermediate tolerances (30 to 86% stand reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cotton and corn were the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard, cucumber and lettuce were the most susceptible crops, with 71 to 98% survival reduction.

Taxon
Mustard, cucumber, and lettucee0
Outcome
plant survivale0
Direction
reductione0
Value
71 to 98%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mustard, cucumber, and lettuce were the most susceptible crops (71 to 98% reduction in plant survival)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1331 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum effective MF rate was 250 g m−2, applied before emergence or incorporated before planting.

Treatment
MF PPI or PREe0
Outcome
minimum effective ratee0
Value
250 g m−2e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum effective rate was 250 g m−2 MF PPI or PRE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1387 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

in vitro · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 30 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.