Paper · 2020 · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society

Straw-based biochar mediated potassium availability and increased growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Muhammad Farooq Qayyum; Ghulam Haider; Muhammad Ali Raza; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
40
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Potassium (K) being the major limiting factor affecting cotton yield and quality has received massive research attention and the effects of various K fertilization techniques/organic amendments have been studied extensively. However, it is not clear whether the straw based, high pH biochar affects K availability, lint yield and quality of the cotton crop in alkaline calcareous soils. In the present study, we carried out a field experiment on a moderate to strongly calcareous silt loam soil to demonstrate the effect of straw-based biochar and potassium application levels on the growth, seed cotton yield and the lint quality. The experimental treatments comprised of two factors, A) biochar types i) Control no biochar, ii) Rice husk biochar (RHB), iii) Wheat straw biochar (WSB), and iv) Rice straw biochar (RSB), factor B) potassium application levels (i) control, no K fertilizer application, ii) K at 15 kg ha−1, and iii) K at 30 kg ha−1 (4 × 3 × 3, n = 36). Results showed that overall cotton growth and yield was significantly improved with increasing rates of potassium application. Three biochar sources affected seed cotton yield and quality with varying effects. For instance, the RSB increased plant height (11.71% to 22.47%), number of bolls per plant (0.74% to 13.75%), average boll weight (35.44% to 36.22%), the seed cotton yield was increased by 14.48% over the control when rice straw biochar was applied in combination with potassium at 30 kg ha−1. However, the ginning out turn (%) was declined with potassium application in combination with all three-biochar compared to control (no biochar addition). The WSB increased staple length and micronaire by 4.32% and 24.50% without potassium application. The potential effects of straw based biochar and potassium application on seed cotton yield and quality deserve further studies to identify the most suitable biochar as per soil chemical properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton growth and yield were significantly improved with increasing rates of potassium application.

Treatment
potassium applicatione0
Outcome
cotton growth and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overall cotton growth and yield was significantly improved with increasing rates of potassium application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw biochar (RSB) increased cotton plant height by 11.71% to 22.47%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
RSBe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.71% to 22.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RSB increased plant height (11.71% to 22.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw biochar (RSB) increased the number of bolls per cotton plant by 0.74% to 13.75%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
RSBe0
Outcome
number of bolls per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.74% to 13.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RSB increased plant height (11.71% to 22.47%), number of bolls per plant (0.74% to 13.75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw biochar (RSB) increased average cotton boll weight by 35.44% to 36.22%.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
RSBe0
Outcome
average boll weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.44% to 36.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RSB increased plant height (11.71% to 22.47%), number of bolls per plant (0.74% to 13.75%), average boll weight (35.44% to 36.22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield increased by 14.48% over the control when rice straw biochar was applied together with potassium at 30 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
rice straw biochar was applied in combination with potassium at 30 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.48%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed cotton yield was increased by 14.48% over the control when rice straw biochar was applied in combination with potassium at 30 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ginning out turn of cotton declined with potassium application combined with each of the three biochars compared with the control without biochar.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
potassium application in combination with all three-biochare0
Outcome
ginning out turne0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
control (no biochar addition)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ginning out turn (%) was declined with potassium application in combination with all three-biochar compared to control (no biochar addition)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw biochar (WSB) increased cotton staple length by 4.32% without potassium application.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
WSBe0
Outcome
staple lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.32%e0
Qualifier
without potassium applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WSB increased staple length and micronaire by 4.32% and 24.50% without potassium application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw biochar (WSB) increased cotton micronaire by 24.50% without potassium application.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
WSBe0
Outcome
micronairee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.50%e0
Qualifier
without potassium applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WSB increased staple length and micronaire by 4.32% and 24.50% without potassium application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three biochar sources affected seed cotton yield and quality with varying effects.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Three biochar sourcese0
Outcome
seed cotton yield and qualitye0
Direction
varying effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three biochar sources affected seed cotton yield and quality with varying effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–115 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Triticum aestivum · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

biochar · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

biochar · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.