Paper · 2005 · Weed Science

Impact of a terminated wheat cover crop in irrigated corn on atrazine rates and water use efficiency

Randall S. Currie; Norman L. Klocke

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted near Garden City, KS with irrigated corn to determine how the integration of a terminated winter wheat cover crop with various atrazine rates would affect Palmer amaranth control and corn water use efficiency (WUE). Without atrazine, the presence of a winter wheat cover crop, killed in the boot stage, resulted in a threefold weed biomass reduction in irrigated corn. The highest rate of atrazine completely masked the weed control effect of the cover crop, producing a greater than 15-fold reduction regardless of the presence or absence of the cover crop. A terminated winter wheat cover crop without atrazine elevated corn yield in only two of nine location-yr, and in one instance, depressed yield. However, a terminated wheat cover crop elevated corn yield in six of nine location-yr combinations when used in conjunction with 1.6 kg ha −1 atrazine. Although increases in WUE associated with reductions in soil water evaporation produced by the cover crop seemed to be responsible for some of the increase in corn grain yield and stored soil water at the end of the summer growing season, end of season Palmer amaranth biomass had a more profound impact.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without atrazine, a terminated winter wheat cover crop reduced weed biomass threefold in irrigated corn.

Treatment
winter wheat cover crop, killed in the boot stagee1
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe2weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
reductione1
Value
threefolde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Without atrazine, the presence of a winter wheat cover crop, killed in the boot stage, resulted in a threefold weed biomass reduction in irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–389 · show in text ↑
e2

“would affect Palmer amaranth control and corn water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest atrazine rate the weed control effect of the cover crop was completely masked.

Treatment
highest rate of atrazinee1
Outcome
weed control effecte1
Setting
Garden City, KSe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest rate of atrazine completely masked the weed control effect of the cover crop, producing a greater than 15-fold reduction regardless of the presence or absence of the cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–579 · show in text ↑
e3

“A study was conducted near Garden City, KS with irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest atrazine rate reduced weed biomass more than 15-fold regardless of the presence or absence of the cover crop.

Treatment
highest rate of atrazinee1
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe2weed
Outcome
weed controle1
Direction
reductione1
Value
greater than 15-folde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest rate of atrazine completely masked the weed control effect of the cover crop, producing a greater than 15-fold reduction regardless of the presence or absence of the cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–579 · show in text ↑
e2

“would affect Palmer amaranth control and corn water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–236 · show in text ↑
e3

“A study was conducted near Garden City, KS with irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without atrazine, a terminated winter wheat cover crop elevated corn yield in only two of nine location-years.

Treatment
terminated winter wheat cover crope1
Outcome
corn yielde1
Direction
elevatede1
Value
two of nine location-yre1
Qualifier
without atrazinee1
Setting
Garden City, KSe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A terminated winter wheat cover crop without atrazine elevated corn yield in only two of nine location-yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–686 · show in text ↑
e3

“A study was conducted near Garden City, KS with irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without atrazine, a terminated winter wheat cover crop depressed corn yield in one instance.

Treatment
terminated winter wheat cover crope1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
depressede1
Value
in one instancee1
Qualifier
without atrazinee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A terminated winter wheat cover crop without atrazine elevated corn yield in only two of nine location-yr, and in one instance, depressed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 1.6 kg ha -1 atrazine, a terminated wheat cover crop elevated corn yield in six of nine location-year combinations.

Treatment
terminated wheat cover crope1
Outcome
corn yielde1
Direction
elevatede1
Value
six of nine location-yr combinationse1
Qualifier
when used in conjunction with 1.6 kg ha −1 atrazinee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“However, a terminated wheat cover crop elevated corn yield in six of nine location-yr combinations when used in conjunction with 1.6 kg ha −1 atrazine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–876 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased water use efficiency with reduced soil evaporation under the cover crop seemed partly responsible for the corn yield increase.

Outcome
corn grain yielde1
Qualifier
increases in WUE associated with reductions in soil water evaporatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“increases in WUE associated with reductions in soil water evaporation produced by the cover crop seemed to be responsible for some of the increase in corn grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1053 · show in text ↑
e3

“A study was conducted near Garden City, KS with irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-of-season Palmer amaranth biomass had a more profound impact on corn than the water use efficiency gains.

Interactor
Palmer amaranthe1weed
Outcome
end of season Palmer amaranth biomasse1
Qualifier
had a more profound impacte1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“end of season Palmer amaranth biomass had a more profound impact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1181 · show in text ↑
e3

“A study was conducted near Garden City, KS with irrigated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Triticum aestivum · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 83 positive, 19 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

cover crop · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

48 papers: 36 positive, 12 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.