Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae Sinica

Regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in grapes in vitro by genistein and cGMP.

Yunna Zhu; Zhonghua Wang; Zhiping Zhang; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It was found in previous paper that the anthocyanin accumulation in peach fruit skin was promoted by genistein(GNT)but inhibited by cGMP,which is quite different from the prevailing hypotheses in this field. In this study,we once again observed that GNT promoted anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry skin in vitro. The anthocyanin accumulation induced by GNT was dependent on light exposure. However,a dark period about 10–12 h was necessary during GNT induction. This may suggest that light is unnecessary for the direct physiological responses for berries to GNT treatment,but necessary for anthocyanin accumulation. Furthermore,it was found that if the berries were treated with cGMP at once following GNT pretreatment,the GNT-induced anthocyanin accumulation was significantly inhibited. However,if cGMP treatment was conducted 12 h after GNT pretreatment,the inhibition of cGMP was no longer observed,suggesting that the GNT-induced physiological responses might be completed in 12 h. Detection by semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed the expression of the genes includingPAL,CHS and UFGT,which are related with anthocyanin biosynthesis,were up-regulated by light exposure and GNT treatment in grape skin,while LDOX seemed no response to these two factors. Treatment with cGMP inhibited RNA accumulation of PAL and CHS induced by GNT,suggesting that GNT and cGMP be of antagonism in regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in grape skins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNT promoted anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry skin in vitro.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
berry skine0
Treatment
GNTe0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,we once again observed that GNT promoted anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry skin in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNT-induced anthocyanin accumulation depended on light exposure.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
light exposuree0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Qualifier
induced by GNTe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The anthocyanin accumulation induced by GNT was dependent on light exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A dark period of about 10–12 h was necessary during GNT induction.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
dark periode0
Value
10–12 he0
Qualifier
necessary during GNT inductione0

Verbatim

e0

“However,a dark period about 10–12 h was necessary during GNT induction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest light is unnecessary for direct berry responses to GNT but necessary for anthocyanin accumulation.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
GNT treatmente0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Qualifier
light is unnecessary for the direct physiological responses for berries to GNT treatment,but necessary for anthocyanin accumulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“This may suggest that light is unnecessary for the direct physiological responses for berries to GNT treatment,but necessary for anthocyanin accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

cGMP immediately after GNT pretreatment significantly inhibited GNT-induced anthocyanin accumulation.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
cGMPe0
Outcome
GNT-induced anthocyanin accumulatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
at once following GNT pretreatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“if the berries were treated with cGMP at once following GNT pretreatment,the GNT-induced anthocyanin accumulation was significantly inhibited.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cGMP 12 h after GNT pretreatment showed no observed inhibition.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
cGMP treatmente0
Outcome
inhibition of cGMPe0
Direction
no longer observede0
Qualifier
12 h after GNT pretreatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“if cGMP treatment was conducted 12 h after GNT pretreatment,the inhibition of cGMP was no longer observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

GNT-induced physiological responses might be completed in 12 h.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
GNTe0
Outcome
physiological responsese0
Value
12 he0
Qualifier
might be completede0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that the GNT-induced physiological responses might be completed in 12 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light exposure up-regulated PAL, CHS and UFGT expression in grape skin.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
light exposuree0
Gene
PAL,CHS and UFGTe0
Outcome
expression of the genese0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Detection by semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed the expression of the genes includingPAL,CHS and UFGT,which are related with anthocyanin biosynthesis,were up-regulated by light exposure and GNT treatment in grape skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNT up-regulated PAL, CHS and UFGT expression in grape skin.

Taxon
grapee0
Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
GNT treatmente0
Gene
PAL,CHS and UFGTe0
Outcome
expression of the genese0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Detection by semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed the expression of the genes includingPAL,CHS and UFGT,which are related with anthocyanin biosynthesis,were up-regulated by light exposure and GNT treatment in grape skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDOX seemed unresponsive to light exposure.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
light exposuree0
Gene
LDOXe0
Outcome
LDOXe0
Direction
no responsee0
Qualifier
seemede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“were up-regulated by light exposure and GNT treatment in grape skin,while LDOX seemed no response to these two factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDOX seemed unresponsive to GNT treatment.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
GNT treatmente0
Gene
LDOXe0
Outcome
LDOXe0
Direction
no responsee0
Qualifier
seemede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“were up-regulated by light exposure and GNT treatment in grape skin,while LDOX seemed no response to these two factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cGMP inhibited GNT-induced PAL and CHS RNA accumulation.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
cGMPe0
Gene
PAL and CHSe0
Outcome
RNA accumulation of PAL and CHSe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
induced by GNTe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with cGMP inhibited RNA accumulation of PAL and CHS induced by GNT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest GNT and cGMP act antagonistically in grape skin anthocyanin regulation.

Taxon
grapee0
Compound
GNT and cGMPe0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Qualifier
antagonisme0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that GNT and cGMP be of antagonism in regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in grape skins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1440 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: expression · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.