Paper · 2014 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Tissues of a Teinturier Grape Cultivar under Sunlight Exclusion

Le Guan; Ji-Hu Li; Pei-Ge Fan; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Yan-73 (Vitis vinifera) is a teinturier grape cultivar, which accumulates anthocyanins in skin, pulp, pedicels, and rachis. The effects of sunlight on anthocyanin biosynthesis and regulation in various tissues of this teinturier cultivar were investigated. Light transmission measurements showed that covering with opaque boxes substantially reduced light intensity around clusters; ≤0.25% of incident light reached the berry skin and <0.05% reached the pulp. The pulp naturally experiences increasing sunlight exclusion by skin during ripening. Sunlight exclusion reduced and delayed anthocyanin biosynthesis in skin and pulp during berry development, while both tissues nevertheless accumulated enough anthocyanins to turn dark red. No strong reduction of anthocyanin concentration was observed in pedicels or rachis. Sunlight exclusion decreased transcript abundance of VvUFGT, VvMybA1, VvMybA2, and VvMyc1 in both skin and pulp and also decreased transcript abundance of VvMycA1 in pulp. Sunlight exclusion differently influenced the anthocyanin components: it decreased the relative proportion of 3′,4′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyanins and increased that of 3′,4′-hydroxylated anthocyanins in berry skin and pulp, which corresponded to the change in the ratio of VvF3′H to VvF3′5′H. These results allow for insight on anthocyanin biosynthesis in various grape tissues in absence of sunlight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opaque boxes reduced light reaching berry skin to at most 0.25% and pulp to less than 0.05% of incident light.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
berry skine0
Treatment
covering with opaque boxese0
Outcome
light intensity around clusterse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
≤0.25%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“covering with opaque boxes substantially reduced light intensity around clusters; ≤0.25% of incident light reached the berry skin and <0.05% reached the pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grape pulp experiences increasing exclusion of sunlight by the skin during ripening.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
pulpe0
Outcome
sunlight exclusione0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
during ripeninge0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pulp naturally experiences increasing sunlight exclusion by skin during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight exclusion reduced and delayed anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape skin and pulp during berry development.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
skin and pulpe0
Treatment
Sunlight exclusione0
Outcome
anthocyanin biosynthesise0
Direction
reduced and delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sunlight exclusion reduced and delayed anthocyanin biosynthesis in skin and pulp during berry development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite sunlight exclusion, grape skin and pulp accumulated enough anthocyanins to turn dark red.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
both tissuese0
Outcome
accumulated enough anthocyanins to turn dark rede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“both tissues nevertheless accumulated enough anthocyanins to turn dark red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight exclusion caused no strong reduction in anthocyanin concentration in grape pedicels or rachis.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
pedicels or rachise0
Outcome
anthocyanin concentratione0
Direction
No strong reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“No strong reduction of anthocyanin concentration was observed in pedicels or rachis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight exclusion decreased VvUFGT, VvMybA1, VvMybA2 and VvMyc1 transcript abundance in grape skin and pulp.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
skin and pulpe0
Treatment
Sunlight exclusione0
Gene
VvUFGT, VvMybA1, VvMybA2, and VvMyc1e0
Outcome
transcript abundancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sunlight exclusion decreased transcript abundance of VvUFGT, VvMybA1, VvMybA2, and VvMyc1 in both skin and pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight exclusion decreased VvMycA1 transcript abundance in grape pulp.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
pulpe0
Treatment
Sunlight exclusione0
Gene
VvMycA1e0
Outcome
transcript abundancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sunlight exclusion decreased transcript abundance of VvUFGT, VvMybA1, VvMybA2, and VvMyc1 in both skin and pulp and also decreased transcript abundance of VvMycA1 in pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight exclusion decreased the relative proportion of 3′,4′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyanins in grape berry skin and pulp.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
berry skin and pulpe0
Treatment
Sunlight exclusione0
Outcome
relative proportion of 3′,4′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyaninse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sunlight exclusion differently influenced the anthocyanin components: it decreased the relative proportion of 3′,4′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyanins and increased that of 3′,4′-hydroxylated anthocyanins in berry skin and pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight exclusion increased the relative proportion of 3′,4′-hydroxylated anthocyanins in grape berry skin and pulp.

Taxon
Grapet0
Organ / stage
berry skin and pulpe0
Treatment
Sunlight exclusione0
Outcome
3′,4′-hydroxylated anthocyaninse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sunlight exclusion differently influenced the anthocyanin components: it decreased the relative proportion of 3′,4′,5′-hydroxylated anthocyanins and increased that of 3′,4′-hydroxylated anthocyanins in berry skin and pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1213 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The changes in grape anthocyanin proportions corresponded to a change in the ratio of VvF3′H to VvF3′5′H.

Taxon
Grapet0
Gene
VvF3′H to VvF3′5′He0
Outcome
anthocyanin componentse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“which corresponded to the change in the ratio of VvF3′H to VvF3′5′H”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sunlight exclusion differently influenced the anthocyanin components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1060 · show in text ↑

light · molecular: expression · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.