Paper · 2015 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Winter wheat fertilized with biogas residue and mining waste: yielding and the quality of grain

Krzysztof Różyło; Urszula Gawlik‐Dziki; Michał Świeca; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Environmental protection problems and efforts to increase agricultural productivity result in attempts to use various organic and mineral wastes as fertilizers. This study aimed to determine the effect of biogas residue (BR) and mining waste (MS) fertilization on wheat yield as well as the nutritional and pro-health quality of grains produced. RESULTS: After the application of MS and BR wheat grain yield was increased compared to unfertilized wheat. The highest grain yield and thousand-grain weight were obtained after MS+BR fertilization. Grains of wheat fertilized with BR and MS+BR contained significantly more protein and wet gluten compared to no fertilization and conventional fertilization (NPK). The studied conditions did not statistically affect starch content. BR fertilization significantly increased the total phenolic content; however, grains of wheat fertilized with NPK were characterized by the highest content of flavonoids and syringic, p-coumaric and sinapic acids. Compared to NPK, waste fertilizations positively affect the reducing power and antiradical activity of wheat. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the wastes evaluated can be an alternative to conventional fertilization in the soil tested that without any significant deterioration and in some cases significant improvement of yield and wheat quality. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mining waste increased wheat grain yield versus unfertilized wheat.

Treatment
MSe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the application of MS and BR wheat grain yield was increased compared to unfertilized wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas residue increased wheat grain yield versus unfertilized wheat.

Treatment
BRe0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the application of MS and BR wheat grain yield was increased compared to unfertilized wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined waste fertilizer produced the highest grain yield and thousand grain weight.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MS+BR fertilizatione0
Outcome
highest grain yield and thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield and thousand-grain weight were obtained after MS+BR fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas residue produced more grain protein and wet gluten than no fertilizer or NPK.

Treatment
BRe0
Outcome
protein and wet glutene0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
no fertilization and conventional fertilization (NPK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grains of wheat fertilized with BR and MS+BR contained significantly more protein and wet gluten compared to no fertilization and conventional fertilization (NPK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined waste fertilizer produced more grain protein and wet gluten than no fertilizer or NPK.

Treatment
MS+BRe0
Outcome
protein and wet glutene0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
no fertilization and conventional fertilization (NPK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grains of wheat fertilized with BR and MS+BR contained significantly more protein and wet gluten compared to no fertilization and conventional fertilization (NPK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization conditions did not statistically affect starch content.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
studied conditionse0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
did not statistically affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The studied conditions did not statistically affect starch content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas residue significantly increased total phenolic content.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
BR fertilizatione0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BR fertilization significantly increased the total phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizer gave the highest flavonoid and named phenolic acid contents.

Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
highest content of flavonoids and syringic, p-coumaric and sinapic acidse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grains of wheat fertilized with NPK were characterized by the highest content of flavonoids and syringic, p-coumaric and sinapic acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waste fertilizers improved reducing power and antiradical activity versus NPK.

Treatment
waste fertilizationse0
Outcome
reducing power and antiradical activitye0
Direction
positively affecte0
Comparator
NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to NPK, waste fertilizations positively affect the reducing power and antiradical activity of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest evaluated wastes as alternatives to conventional fertilizer in tested soil.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
alternative to conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that the wastes evaluated can be an alternative to conventional fertilization in the soil tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑

brassinolide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.