Paper · 2008

EFFECT OF INTRA-SPACING AND NITROGEN RATES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SORGHUM (Sorghum bicolor L.) Var. ICSV 400

A.A. Manga

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted in 1999 and 2001 rainy seasons in the Teaching and Research Farm of the Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahamadu Bello University, Zaria( 11 0 11’ N and 7 0 38’ E) to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400. The treatments were made up of three intra-row spacing (25, 50 and 75 cm) combined with four nitrogen rates (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg N/ha). Randomized complete block design was used for the trials. The results have shown that intra-row spacing had a significant influence on plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter, and grain yield but had no effect on stand count. Neither intra-row spacing nor nitrogen had an effect on flag leaf area or panicle length. Nitrogen application was also observed to have significant influence on all the characters mentioned earlier. The closest intra-row spacing of 25 cm gave 35.06 and 38.59% increase in yield in 1999 and 2001 respectively over the widest spacing of 75 cm. The response of sorghum yield to nitrogen was up to 60 and 90kg N/ha in 1999 and 2001 respectively. The increase in yield when these responses were compared to plots that did not receive nitrogen was 32.44 and 27.0% for 1999 and 2001, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The closest intra-row spacing of 25 cm gave a 35.06% yield increase in 1999 over the widest spacing of 75 cm.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
intra-row spacing of 25 cme2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
35.06e2
Qualifier
1999e2
Comparator
widest spacing of 75 cme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“The closest intra-row spacing of 25 cm gave 35.06 and 38.59% increase in yield in 1999 and 2001 respectively over the widest spacing of 75 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The closest intra-row spacing of 25 cm gave a 38.59% yield increase in 2001 over the widest spacing of 75 cm.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
intra-row spacing of 25 cme2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
38.59%e2
Qualifier
2001e2
Comparator
widest spacing of 75 cme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“The closest intra-row spacing of 25 cm gave 35.06 and 38.59% increase in yield in 1999 and 2001 respectively over the widest spacing of 75 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1040 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum yield responded to nitrogen up to 60 kg N/ha in 1999 and 90 kg N/ha in 2001.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume3
Treatment
nitrogene3
Outcome
response of sorghum yield to nitrogene3
Qualifier
up to 60 and 90kg N/hae3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The response of sorghum yield to nitrogen was up to 60 and 90kg N/ha in 1999 and 2001 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased sorghum yield by 32.44% in 1999 compared with plots that did not receive nitrogen.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
nitrogene4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
32.44e4
Qualifier
1999e4
Comparator
plots that did not receive nitrogene4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increase in yield when these responses were compared to plots that did not receive nitrogen was 32.44 and 27.0% for 1999 and 2001, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased sorghum yield by 27.0% in 2001 compared with plots that did not receive nitrogen.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
nitrogene4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
27.0%e4
Qualifier
2001e4
Comparator
plots that did not receive nitrogene4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increase in yield when these responses were compared to plots that did not receive nitrogen was 32.44 and 27.0% for 1999 and 2001, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing had a significant influence on plant height, number of leaves per plant and dry matter of sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
intra-row spacinge5
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry mattere5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“intra-row spacing had a significant influence on plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter, and grain yield but had no effect on stand count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing had no effect on sorghum stand count.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
intra-row spacinge5
Outcome
stand counte5
Direction
no effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“intra-row spacing had a significant influence on plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter, and grain yield but had no effect on stand count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intra-row spacing had no effect on flag leaf area or panicle length of sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
intra-row spacinge6
Outcome
flag leaf area or panicle lengthe6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e6

“Neither intra-row spacing nor nitrogen had an effect on flag leaf area or panicle length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen had no effect on flag leaf area or panicle length of sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
nitrogene6
Outcome
flag leaf area or panicle lengthe6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e6

“Neither intra-row spacing nor nitrogen had an effect on flag leaf area or panicle length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application had a significant influence on all the sorghum characters measured.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
ICSV 400e1
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione7
Outcome
all the characters mentioned earliere7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to test the effect intra- row spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) var. ICSV 400”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–322 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen application was also observed to have significant influence on all the characters mentioned earlier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–897 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

100 papers: 80 positive, 20 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

density · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

density · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 26 positive, 15 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.