Paper · 1999 · jpa

Grain Sorghum Response to Row Spacings and Seeding Rates in Kansas

S. A. Staggenborg; D. L. Fjell; D. L. Devlin; et al.

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
47
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Previous research suggests that reducing row spacings increased grain sorghum's [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] yield potential. However, most of this research was conducted in environments with lower yield potentials than currently found in northeast Kansas. The objectives of this study were to determine the impact that reducing row spacing had on grain sorghum grain yields and yield components. Research was conducted over five location‐years in northeast Kansas to evaluate the effects of row spacings and plant populations on grain sorghum yields. Two hybrids were planted in 10, 20, and 30 in. rows at 30 000,60 000, and 90 000 plants/acre. In environments where yields exceeded 100 bu/acre, yields were approximately 10% higher from the 10 and 20 in. rows than from the 30 in. rows. When moisture and temperature stress limited grain yields, no yield differences occurred among the row‐spacing treatments. Grain yields responded little to changes in plant populations throughout the study. Reducing spacing per plant (reducing row spacing or plant populations) reduced panicles per plant. Caryopses per panicle and caryopses weights were affected primarily by growing conditions during their respective development periods. These results suggest that decreasing sorghum row spacing below 30 in. will increase grain yields under high yielding environments with little risk of reducing yields in lower yielding environments. This study also indicates that seeding rates do not have to be altered as narrow row systems are adopted. Research Question Previous research has shown an increase in grain yields in crops such as soybeans and corn when row spacing was reduced. This response has varied across environments based on their yield potential. Grain sorghum producers are beginning to question the impact that reducing row spacings from 30 or 36 in. to 10 or 20 in. will have on grain yields. A secondary concern is whether plant populations have to be increased simultaneously to achieve maximum grain yields. The objective of this study was to determine the impact that row spacings and plant populations have on grain sorghum yields. Literature Summary Recently, the influences of row spacing on grain sorghum canopy architecture, light interception, and grain yields have been of interest. Several researchers have reported higher yields in narrow rows (12, 15, and 20 in.) under favorable growing conditions. The advantage of the narrow rows has been attributed to improved light and water use efficiency. Others have reported stable grain sorghum yields over a wide range of plant populations within a given environment, suggesting that as sorghum row spacings are reduced, optimal yields may be achieved without increasing plant populations. Study Description Field studies were conducted during 1995 and 1996 at three locations in northeast Kansas. Early‐ and late‐maturing grain sorghum hybrids were seeded in 10, 20, and 30 in. rows at seeding rates designed to achieve target plant populations of 30 000, 60 000, and 90 000 plants/acre. The final average stands were 36 654, 59 904, and 86 967 plants/acre. Applied Questions Did row spacings affect sorghum grain yields? The effects of reducing row spacings from 30 in. to 20 or 10 in. were different in high‐ and low‐yielding environments. In the environments with grain yields above 100 bu/acre, narrow rows resulted in higher yields than the wide rows (Fig. ). The 10 in. rows resulted in grain yields that were approximately 9% (11 bu/acre) greater than those in the 20 in. rows and 11% (15 bu/acre) greater than those in the 30 in. rows across all environments. In environments where grain yields were under 100 bu/acre, no yield differences occurred among the row spacing treatments. The advantage of the narrow rows in the higher‐yielding environments was probably the result of greater light and water use efficiency. In the lower‐yielding environments, the lack of yield response across the row spacing treatments was probably the result of their water use characteristics. When an extended period of dry weather occurred, the narrow rows depleted the stored soil water faster than wide rows, in which the canopy had not closed. Under such conditions, increased light interception by the narrow rows increased water use. Because the dry period extended for several weeks, the narrow rows probably used more water, experienced water stress earlier than the wide rows, and suffered water stress for a longer time. Grain sorghum yields at three row spacings in five location‐years in northeast Kansas. image Did plant populations have to be increased to achieve maximum yields as row spacings were reduced? Regardless of the row spacing, grain sorghum yields increased as plant populations were increased from 30 000 to 60 000/acre. However, no further increase in grain yields occurred as populations increased to 90 000 plants/acre. These results are similar to those of previous research, which indicated that sorghum yields were very stable across a wide range of plant populations. This stability was the result of the plant's ability to adjust panicle number per plant and seed number per panicle in response to the conditions encountered during the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high-yielding environments, 10- and 20-inch rows yielded about 10% more than 30-inch rows.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 and 20 in. rowse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
approximately 10%e0
Qualifier
yields exceeded 100 bu/acree0
Comparator
30 in. rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In environments where yields exceeded 100 bu/acre, yields were approximately 10% higher from the 10 and 20 in. rows than from the 30 in. rows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moisture and temperature stress, row spacing did not differentiate yield.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
row‐spacing treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
no yield differencese0
Qualifier
moisture and temperature stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When moisture and temperature stress limited grain yields, no yield differences occurred among the row‐spacing treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield changed little across plant populations.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
changes in plant populationse0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
responded littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields responded little to changes in plant populations throughout the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced spacing per plant reduced panicles per plant.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Reducing spacing per plante0
Outcome
panicles per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing spacing per plant (reducing row spacing or plant populations) reduced panicles per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing conditions primarily affected caryopses per panicle and caryopsis weights.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
Caryopses per panicle and caryopses weightse0
Setting
growing conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Caryopses per panicle and caryopses weights were affected primarily by growing conditions during their respective development periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise narrowing rows below 30 inches in high-yield settings.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
decreasing sorghum row spacing below 30 in.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing sorghum row spacing below 30 in. will increase grain yields under high yielding environments with little risk of reducing yields in lower yielding environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1431 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise that seeding rates need not change with narrow rows.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
seeding rates do not have to be alterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seeding rates do not have to be altered as narrow row systems are adopted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-inch rows yielded approximately 9% more than 20-inch rows across environments.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 in. rowse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
approximately 9% (11 bu/acre)e0
Comparator
20 in. rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10 in. rows resulted in grain yields that were approximately 9% (11 bu/acre) greater than those in the 20 in. rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3435–3553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-inch rows yielded approximately 11% more than 30-inch rows across environments.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 in. rowse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
11% (15 bu/acre)e0
Comparator
30 in. rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10 in. rows resulted in grain yields that were approximately 9% (11 bu/acre) greater than those in the 20 in. rows and 11% (15 bu/acre) greater than those in the 30 in. rows across all environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3435–3637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield rose as population increased from 30,000 to 60,000 per acre.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
60 000/acree0
Outcome
grain sorghum yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
30 000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain sorghum yields increased as plant populations were increased from 30 000 to 60 000/acre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4715–4809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing population to 90,000 per acre produced no further grain-yield gain.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
90 000 plants/acree0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
no further increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no further increase in grain yields occurred as populations increased to 90 000 plants/acre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4819–4911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
t1

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 26 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.