Paper · 2000 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Nutrient Uptake by Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Associated Weeds as Influenced by Fertilizer Levels and Weed Management

I.B. Pandey; S. S. Mishra; Harendra Pal Singh; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to find out the nutrient uptake by wheat and associated weeds as influenced by fertilizer levels and weed management. Increasing fertilizer levels resulted in significantly better crop performance alongwith higher weed count and weed dry weight than no fertilizer. Weed control treatments increased the N, P and K uptake by the cropby 135.5 to 149.0%, 133.9 to 148.5% and 133.3 to 145.6%, respectively. As compared to the weedy check, weed control treatments reduced the N, P and K depletion by weeds by 69.2 to 75.4%, 68.2 to 74.3% and 69.2 to 75.0%, respectively. Among the weed control treatments, hand weeding recorded the maximum uptake of these nutrients by crop and the minimum depletion of NPK by weeds. Grain yield significantly increased with increasing levels of fertilizers and maximum grain yield was obtained at 160: 80: 60 kg NPK/ha. Among the weed control treatments, hand weeding being at par with isoproturon produced significantly higher grain yield than others.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer levels improved crop performance relative to no fertilizer.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
crop performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
no fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing fertilizer levels resulted in significantly better crop performance alongwith higher weed count and weed dry weight than no fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer levels raised weed count relative to no fertilizer.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
weed counte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing fertilizer levels resulted in significantly better crop performance alongwith higher weed count and weed dry weight than no fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer levels raised weed dry weight relative to no fertilizer.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing fertilizer levels resulted in significantly better crop performance alongwith higher weed count and weed dry weight than no fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased crop N uptake by 135.5 to 149.0%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by the cropbye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
135.5 to 149.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control treatments increased the N, P and K uptake by the cropby 135.5 to 149.0%, 133.9 to 148.5% and 133.3 to 145.6%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased crop P uptake by 133.9 to 148.5%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by the cropbye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
133.9 to 148.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control treatments increased the N, P and K uptake by the cropby 135.5 to 149.0%, 133.9 to 148.5% and 133.3 to 145.6%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control increased crop K uptake by 133.3 to 145.6%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by the cropbye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
133.3 to 145.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control treatments increased the N, P and K uptake by the cropby 135.5 to 149.0%, 133.9 to 148.5% and 133.3 to 145.6%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control reduced weed N depletion by 69.2 to 75.4% relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K depletion by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
69.2 to 75.4%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the weedy check, weed control treatments reduced the N, P and K depletion by weeds by 69.2 to 75.4%, 68.2 to 74.3% and 69.2 to 75.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control reduced weed P depletion by 68.2 to 74.3% relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K depletion by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
68.2 to 74.3%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the weedy check, weed control treatments reduced the N, P and K depletion by weeds by 69.2 to 75.4%, 68.2 to 74.3% and 69.2 to 75.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control reduced weed K depletion by 69.2 to 75.0% relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K depletion by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
69.2 to 75.0%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to the weedy check, weed control treatments reduced the N, P and K depletion by weeds by 69.2 to 75.4%, 68.2 to 74.3% and 69.2 to 75.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding yielded maximum crop nutrient uptake among weed control treatments.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
maximum uptake of these nutrients by crope0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the weed control treatments, hand weeding recorded the maximum uptake of these nutrients by crop and the minimum depletion of NPK by weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding yielded minimum NPK depletion by weeds among weed control treatments.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
minimum depletion of NPK by weedse0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the weed control treatments, hand weeding recorded the maximum uptake of these nutrients by crop and the minimum depletion of NPK by weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased significantly as fertilizer level increased.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing levels of fertilizerse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield significantly increased with increasing levels of fertilizers and maximum grain yield was obtained at 160: 80: 60 kg NPK/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum grain yield occurred at 160: 80: 60 kg NPK/ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
160: 80: 60 kg NPK/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield significantly increased with increasing levels of fertilizers and maximum grain yield was obtained at 160: 80: 60 kg NPK/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding produced higher grain yield than other weed control treatments and was at par with isoproturon.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with isoproturone0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the weed control treatments, hand weeding being at par with isoproturon produced significantly higher grain yield than others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.