Paper · 2014 · Journal of Horticultural Research

Response Of Guava Trees (Psidium Guajava) To Soil Applications Of Mineral And Organic Fertilisers And Biofertilisers Under Conditions Of Low Fertile Soil

Sushil Kumar Shukla; Tarun Adak; Atul Singha; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The goal of this study was to assess the influence of different organic fertilisers - vermicompost, mulching, Azotobacter, phosphate solubilising microbes (PSM) and Trichoderma harzianum added each year to mineral fertilisers containing NPK and to farmyard manure (FYM) on leaf nutrient status, tree growth, fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil. The results revealed that vermicompost, bio-fertilisers and organic mulching resulted in yield and fruit quality boosters, as compared to application of NPK and FYM as the only organic fertiliser. Significant differences in plant height, canopy spread and stem girth of guava plants were obtained in combination, where Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulching were applied. The leaf nutrient contents (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn) were within sufficient ranges. Fruit yields and quality were highest in combination, where vermicompost, Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulching was applied. Fruit quality parameters viz. soluble solid concentration, titratable acidity, total sugars and ascorbic acid showed positive correlation with the available macro- and micronutrients in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost, bio-fertilisers and organic mulching raised guava yield and fruit quality relative to NPK and FYM alone.

Treatment
vermicompost, bio-fertilisers and organic mulchinge1
Outcome
yield and fruit qualitye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
application of NPK and FYM as the only organic fertilisere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that vermicompost, bio-fertilisers and organic mulching resulted in yield and fruit quality boosters, as compared to application of NPK and FYM as the only organic fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulching in combination gave significant differences in guava plant height, canopy spread and stem girth.

Treatment
Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulchinge2
Outcome
plant height, canopy spread and stem girthe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant differences in plant height, canopy spread and stem girth of guava plants were obtained in combination, where Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulching were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–760 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nutrient contents of guava were within sufficient ranges.

Organ / stage
leafe3
Outcome
leaf nutrient contentse3
Qualifier
within sufficient rangese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–375 · show in text ↑
e3

“The leaf nutrient contents (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn) were within sufficient ranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yields and quality of guava were highest with vermicompost, Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulching combined.

Treatment
vermicompost, Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulchinge4
Outcome
Fruit yields and qualitye4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–375 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit yields and quality were highest in combination, where vermicompost, Azotobacter, T. harzianum, PSM and organic mulching was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–994 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava soluble solid concentration, titratable acidity and total sugars showed positive correlation with available soil macro- and micronutrients.

Compound
available macro- and micronutrients in the soile5
Outcome
soluble solid concentration, titratable acidity, total sugarse5
Direction
positive correlatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–375 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit quality parameters viz. soluble solid concentration, titratable acidity, total sugars and ascorbic acid showed positive correlation with the available macro- and micronutrients in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava ascorbic acid showed positive correlation with available soil macro- and micronutrients.

Compound
available macro- and micronutrients in the soile5
Outcome
ascorbic acide5
Direction
positive correlatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and quality of guava grown in low fertile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–375 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit quality parameters viz. soluble solid concentration, titratable acidity, total sugars and ascorbic acid showed positive correlation with the available macro- and micronutrients in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1190 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.