Paper · 2001 · Packaging Technology and Science

Evaluation of plastic packages for guava refrigerated preservation

Angelo Pedro Jacomino; Ricardo Alfredo Kluge; Claire Isabel Grígoli de Luca Sarantópoulos; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’ were packed in several plastic materials and stored at 10°C and 85–90% relative humidity (RH) for 7, 14, 21 and 28 days (+3 days at 25°C). The plastic materials studied were: multilayer co‐extruded polyolephine film with selective permeability (PSP), low‐density polyethylene film (LDPE), LDPE film with mineral incorporation (LDPEm) and heat‐shrinkable polyolephine film (SHR). Guavas not packed were taken as control samples. The physicochemical characteristics of the fruits, O 2 and CO 2 transmission rates of the packaging materials and gas composition at the package headspace were evaluated. The LDPE film, 69 µm in thickness, with the lowest permeability to both O 2 and CO 2 , led to anaerobiosis and high CO 2 concentration inside the packages and promoted physiological disturbances and changes in fruit flavour. The SHR film, 15 µm in thickness, was the most permeable to CO 2 and had quite high O 2 transmission, which modified the inner atmosphere of the packages slightly. The fruits packed in this film showed a poorer quality than the controls, possibly due to the heat produced during the shrinking of the film. The LDPEm film, 24 µm in thickness, was almost as permeable to CO 2 but had reduced O 2 transmission, promoting an atmosphere of equilibrium of 3% O 2 and 4.5% CO 2 . Fruits packed in this film kept their skin colour and pulp firmness, suitable for consumption up to 14 days. The PSP film, 35 µm in thickness, had the greatest O 2 transmission but just over half of the CO 2 transmission of LDPEm, promoting an atmosphere of equilibrium of 0.5% O 2 and 4.5% CO 2 inside the packages. Fruits packed in such packages kept their physicochemical characteristics up to 21 days. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDPE produced anaerobiosis and high package CO2, with physiological disturbance and flavour change.

Material
‘Kumagai’e1
Treatment
LDPE filme0
Outcome
physiological disturbances and changes in fruit flavoure0
Qualifier
anaerobiosis and high CO 2 concentration inside the packagese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LDPE film, 69 µm in thickness, with the lowest permeability to both O 2 and CO 2 , led to anaerobiosis and high CO 2 concentration inside the packages and promoted physiological disturbances and changes in fruit flavour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHR slightly modified the internal package atmosphere.

Treatment
SHR filme0
Outcome
inner atmosphere of the packagese0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SHR film, 15 µm in thickness, was the most permeable to CO 2 and had quite high O 2 transmission, which modified the inner atmosphere of the packages slightly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guavas in SHR film had poorer quality than unpacked controls, possibly from shrink heat.

Treatment
heat‐shrinkable polyolephine film (SHR)e1
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
poorere0
Qualifier
possibly due to the heat produced during the shrinking of the filme0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruits packed in this film showed a poorer quality than the controls, possibly due to the heat produced during the shrinking of the film.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“heat‐shrinkable polyolephine film (SHR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–407 · show in text ↑
e2

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDPEm established an equilibrium atmosphere of 3% O2 and 4.5% CO2.

Treatment
LDPEm filme0
Outcome
atmosphere of equilibriume0
Value
3% O 2 and 4.5% CO 2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LDPEm film, 24 µm in thickness, was almost as permeable to CO 2 but had reduced O 2 transmission, promoting an atmosphere of equilibrium of 3% O 2 and 4.5% CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDPEm maintained guava skin colour and pulp firmness suitable for consumption up to 14 days.

Treatment
LDPE film with mineral incorporation (LDPEm)e1
Outcome
skin colour and pulp firmnesse0
Direction
kepte0
Value
14 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits packed in this film kept their skin colour and pulp firmness, suitable for consumption up to 14 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1435 · show in text ↑
e1

“LDPE film with mineral incorporation (LDPEm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSP packages reached 0.5% O2 and 4.5% CO2 equilibrium.

Treatment
PSP filme0
Outcome
atmosphere of equilibriume0
Value
0.5% O 2 and 4.5% CO 2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PSP film, 35 µm in thickness, had the greatest O 2 transmission but just over half of the CO 2 transmission of LDPEm, promoting an atmosphere of equilibrium of 0.5% O 2 and 4.5% CO 2 inside the packages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1643 · show in text ↑
e1

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSP packages preserved guava physicochemical characteristics up to 21 days.

Treatment
multilayer co‐extruded polyolephine film with selective permeability (PSP)e1
Outcome
physicochemical characteristicse0
Direction
kepte0
Value
21 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits packed in such packages kept their physicochemical characteristics up to 21 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“multilayer co‐extruded polyolephine film with selective permeability (PSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“Guavas cv. ‘Kumagai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.