Paper · 2024 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF GUAVA (PSIDIUM GUAJAVA L.)

Prerna Kumawat; M Meena; Lalita Bairwa; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.The investigation, titled "Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) on Quality Attributes of Guava," evaluated thirteen treatments, each replicated three times.Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results.This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%).The findings underscore that the application of INM strategies can greatly improve the quality of guava fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment (100% RDF with vermicompost, farm yard manure and microbial inoculants) significantly enhanced guava fruit quality attributes and gave superior results among the thirteen treatments.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
fruit quality attributese2
Direction
significantly enhancede2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment gave a total soluble solids of 11.39 Brix in guava fruit.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
Total Soluble Solids (TSS)e2
Value
11.39( Brix)e2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment gave an ascorbic acid content of 205.20 mg/100g pulp in guava fruit.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente2
Value
205.20 (mg/100g pulp)e2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment gave an acidity of 0.18% in guava fruit.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
aciditye2
Value
0.18(%)e2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment gave total sugars of 7.7% in guava fruit.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
total sugarse2
Value
7.7(%)e2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment gave reducing sugars of 4.30% in guava fruit.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
reducing sugarse2
Value
4.30(%)e2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T11 treatment gave non-reducing sugars of 3.43% in guava fruit.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK)e1
Outcome
non-reducing sugarse2
Value
3.43(%)e2
Setting
2021-2022 agricultural seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the 2021-2022 agricultural season and the primary, objective was to standardize nutrient management practices impacting the quality attributes of guava.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, T 11 , which comprised 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF: 600:300:300 g NPK), supplemented with 10 kg of Vermicompost (VC), 10 kg of Farm Yard Manure (FYM), and microbial inoculants including 10 g of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB), 10 g of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VAM), and 10 g of Azospirillum, exhibited superior results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“This treatment significantly enhanced fruit quality attributes, yielding a Total Soluble Solids (TSS) of 11.39( Brix), ascorbic acid content of 205.20 (mg/100g pulp), acidity of 0.18(%), total sugars of 7.7(%), reducing sugars of 4.30(%), and non-reducing sugars of 3.43(%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–964 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.