Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Effect of polishing and washing on germination quality and viability of sugar beet seed

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Effect of seed polishing as well as washing was done to see germination quality of sugar beet seed. For this purpose, a three factorial experiment was carried out within a randomized completely design in laboratory condition. The first factor was six amounts of seed polishing (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25% removing of seed coat or rubbing). The second factor included seven levels of washing duration (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes) by distilled water. And the third factor was viability of seeds after polishing and washing where their germination was tested immediately after those treatments as well as after storage of them in a room temperature for six months. The experiment was run both in laboratory. The result showed that germination traits were significantly affected both by seed polish and washing. Polishing in amount of 10 and 15% increased germination percentage. Washing of seeds for 60 and 150 minutes also improved germination percentage as well. Investigation of viability demonstrated that no significant difference was observed between the storage times after the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed polishing significantly affected sugar beet germination traits.

Treatment
seed polishe0
Outcome
germination traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed that germination traits were significantly affected both by seed polish and washing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed washing significantly affected sugar beet germination traits.

Treatment
washinge0
Outcome
germination traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed that germination traits were significantly affected both by seed polish and washing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polishing at 10 and 15% increased sugar beet seed germination percentage.

Treatment
Polishing in amount of 10 and 15%e0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polishing in amount of 10 and 15% increased germination percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing for 60 and 150 minutes improved sugar beet seed germination percentage.

Treatment
Washing of seeds for 60 and 150 minutese0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Washing of seeds for 60 and 150 minutes also improved germination percentage as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet seed viability did not differ significantly between storage times after treatments.

Treatment
storage times after the treatmentse0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
storage timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Investigation of viability demonstrated that no significant difference was observed between the storage times after the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–82 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.