Paper · 1997 · Crop Science

Film Coating Impairs Leaching of Germination Inhibitors in Sugar Beet Seed

Xianming Duan; Joseph S. Burris

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Polymer film coating has been applied to commercial sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) seeds in the USA as an effective delivery system for agrochemicals. This research was conducted to study the impact of polymer film coating on sugar beet seed germination. Twelve seed lots, representing nine monogerm cultivars, had standard germination of 89 to 95%. After film coating (20 g of polyvinyl polymer per kilogram seed), the germination percentage varied from 68 to 94%. Six seed lots, including three lots of cultivar HH55, exhibited significant germination reductions after coating. Besides significant cultivar differences, seed lots within the same cultivar (HH55) also showed different responses to coating. After removal of the pericarp, the true seed of sensitive cultivar HH55 did not show germination reductions after coating. This indicates that the interaction between film coating and pericarp factors accounted for the germination reduction in film‐coated seeds. Sensitivity to film coating was alleviated by presoaking or peroxide treatments. A high negative correlation was found between absorbance at 265 am (A 265 nm ) of seed steep solution and coated seed germination percentage ( r = −0.96***). The A 265 nm of steeping solution could reduced to near zero by filtering the solution through the phenolic absorbent polyvinylpyrrolidone. Polymer film coating induced germination reductions in sensitive cnitivars were likely related to restricted oxygen supply to the enclosed embryo and to the retention of water soluble germination inhibitors, which would normally be leached into the germination medium and/or oxidized and deactivated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Film coating significantly reduced germination in six sugar beet seed lots, including three lots of cultivar HH55.

Material
cultivar HH55e1
Treatment
coatinge1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Six seed lots, including three lots of cultivar HH55, exhibited significant germination reductions after coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After film coating, sugar beet germination percentage varied from 68 to 94% against a standard germination of 89 to 95%.

Treatment
film coating (20 g of polyvinyl polymer per kilogram seed)e1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Value
68 to 94%e1
Comparator
standard germinatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Twelve seed lots, representing nine monogerm cultivars, had standard germination of 89 to 95%. After film coating (20 g of polyvinyl polymer per kilogram seed), the germination percentage varied from 68 to 94%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed lots within sugar beet cultivar HH55 showed different responses to film coating.

Material
HH55e1
Outcome
responses to coatinge1
Qualifier
seed lots within the same cultivare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Besides significant cultivar differences, seed lots within the same cultivar (HH55) also showed different responses to coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of the pericarp prevented germination reduction after coating in the true seed of sensitive sugar beet cultivar HH55.

Material
sensitive cultivar HH55e1
Treatment
removal of the pericarpe1
Outcome
germination reductionse1
Direction
did not showe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“After removal of the pericarp, the true seed of sensitive cultivar HH55 did not show germination reductions after coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The germination reduction in film-coated sugar beet seed is attributed to an interaction between film coating and pericarp factors.

Outcome
germination reductione1
Qualifier
interaction between film coating and pericarp factorse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This indicates that the interaction between film coating and pericarp factors accounted for the germination reduction in film‐coated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presoaking or peroxide treatments alleviated sugar beet sensitivity to film coating.

Treatment
presoaking or peroxide treatmentse1
Outcome
Sensitivity to film coatinge1
Direction
alleviatede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sensitivity to film coating was alleviated by presoaking or peroxide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absorbance at 265 nm of seed steep solution was negatively correlated with coated sugar beet seed germination percentage (r = -0.96).

Treatment
absorbance at 265 am (A 265 nm ) of seed steep solutione1
Outcome
coated seed germination percentagee1
Direction
negative correlatione1
Value
r = −0.96***e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A high negative correlation was found between absorbance at 265 am (A 265 nm ) of seed steep solution and coated seed germination percentage ( r = −0.96***)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filtering the steep solution through polyvinylpyrrolidone reduced its A265 nm to near zero.

Treatment
filtering the solution through the phenolic absorbent polyvinylpyrrolidonee1
Outcome
A 265 nm of steeping solutione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
near zeroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The A 265 nm of steeping solution could reduced to near zero by filtering the solution through the phenolic absorbent polyvinylpyrrolidone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Germination reductions of sensitive sugar beet cultivars under polymer film coating are likely due to restricted oxygen supply and retention of water-soluble germination inhibitors.

Outcome
germination reductions in sensitive cnitivarse1
Qualifier
restricted oxygen supply to the enclosed embryo and to the retention of water soluble germination inhibitorse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Polymer film coating induced germination reductions in sensitive cnitivars were likely related to restricted oxygen supply to the enclosed embryo and to the retention of water soluble germination inhibitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–74 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.