Paper · 1995 · Journal of Phytopathology

Development of Eyespot and Brown Foot Rot in Wheat Plants Inoculated with Mixtures of Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides Types and Fusarium Species

G. L. Bateman; I. C. Munnery

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of Fusarium avenaceum, F. culmorum and Microdochium nivale on eyespot development and of types of the eyespot fungus Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides on brown foot rot caused by the Fusarium or Microdochium spp. were investigated by sequential inoculation of wheat plants grown in pots in a controlled environment. The W‐type of the eyespot fungus induced more severe disease than the R‐type, but its symptons were suppressed to a greater extent by Fusarium spp., especially F. avenaceum. Brown foot rot symptoms were sometimes suppressed by P. herpotrichoides but were occasionally more severe when the Fusarium inoculum was applied after the P. herpotrichoides. There, sults are discussed in relation to observations of natural infections.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W-type eyespot fungus induced more severe disease than R-type.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Material
W‐typee0
Interactor
eyespot funguse0pathogen
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
R‐typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W‐type of the eyespot fungus induced more severe disease than the R‐type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium species suppressed W-type eyespot symptoms more than R-type, especially F. avenaceum.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fusarium spp.e0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
symptonse0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
especially F. avenaceume0
Comparator
R‐typee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its symptons were suppressed to a greater extent by Fusarium spp., especially F. avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“the R‐type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. herpotrichoides sometimes suppressed brown foot rot symptoms.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
P. herpotrichoidese0
Interactor
P. herpotrichoidesOculimacula yallundaee0pathogen
Outcome
Brown foot rot symptomse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oculimacula yallundae
Oculimacula yallundae · InteractorMary Burrows from United States Montana State University · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brown foot rot symptoms were sometimes suppressed by P. herpotrichoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown foot rot was occasionally more severe when Fusarium followed P. herpotrichoides.

Taxon
Wheat PlantsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Fusarium inoculume0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
P. herpotrichoidesOculimacula yallundaee0pathogen
Outcome
Brown foot rot symptomse1
Direction
more severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oculimacula yallundae
Oculimacula yallundae · Second interactorMary Burrows from United States Montana State University · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were occasionally more severe when the Fusarium inoculum was applied after the P. herpotrichoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brown foot rot symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–536 · show in text ↑

Oculimacula yallundae · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Fusarium · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.