Paper · 1996 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Influence of the time and rate of liquid-manure application on yield and nitrogen utilization of silage corn in south coastal British Columbia

B. J. Zebarth; J. W. Paul; O. Schmidt; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
81
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Manure-N availability must be known in order to design application practices that maximize the nutrient value of the manure while minimizing adverse environmental impacts. This study determined the effect of time and rate of liquid manure application on silage corn yield and N utilization, and residual soil nitrate at harvest, in south coastal British Columbia. Liquid dairy or liquid hog manure was applied at target rates of 0, 175, 350 or 525 kg N ha −1 , with or without addition of 100 kg N ha −1 as inorganic fertilizer, at two sites in each of 2 yr. Time of liquid-dairy-manure application was also tested at two sites in each of 2 yr with N-application treatments of: 600 kg N ha −1 as manure applied in spring; 600 kg N ha −1 as manure applied in fall; 300 kg N ha −1 as manure applied in each of spring and fall; 200 kg N ha −1 applied as inorganic fertilizer in spring; 300 kg N ha −1 as manure plus 100 kg N ha −1 as inorganic fertilizer applied in spring; and a control that received no applied N. Fall-applied manure did not increase corn yield or N uptake in the following growing season. At all sites, maximum yield was attained using manure only. Selection of proper spring application rates for manure and inorganic fertilizer were found to be equally important in minimizing residual soil nitrate at harvest. Apparent recovery of applied N in the crop ranged from 0 to 33% for manure and from 18 to 93% for inorganic fertilizer. Key words: N recovery, manure management

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall manure did not increase corn yield in the next season.

Treatment
Fall-applied manuree0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall-applied manure did not increase corn yield or N uptake in the following growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall manure did not increase corn N uptake in the next season.

Treatment
Fall-applied manuree0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall-applied manure did not increase corn yield or N uptake in the following growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure alone attained maximum yield at all sites.

Treatment
manure onlye0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At all sites, maximum yield was attained using manure only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“silage corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proper spring rates of manure and inorganic fertilizer were equally important to minimize residual soil nitrate.

Outcome
residual soil nitrate at harveste0
Qualifier
equally importante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selection of proper spring application rates for manure and inorganic fertilizer were found to be equally important in minimizing residual soil nitrate at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“silage corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent crop N recovery from manure ranged from 0 to 33%.

Outcome
Apparent recovery of applied N in the crope0
Value
0 to 33%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent recovery of applied N in the crop ranged from 0 to 33% for manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“silage corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent crop N recovery from inorganic fertilizer ranged from 18 to 93%.

Outcome
inorganic fertilizere0
Value
18 to 93%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 18 to 93% for inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“silage corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.