Paper · 2007 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Liquid Cattle Manure on Corn Yield, Composition, and Soil Properties

Anastasios S. Lithourgidis; Theodora Matsi; Nikolaos Barbayiannis; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
93
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of liquid dairy cattle ( Bos taurus ) manure on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied in a 4‐yr field experiment conducted under a Mediterranean environment. In addition, long‐term impact of (8‐yr) manure application on soil‐available NO 3 –N, P, and K; organic C; Kjeldahl N; and salinity was investigated. Four treatments were established in plots, previously used for a similar 4‐yr experiment with winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Treatments were: (i) application of 80 Mg manure ha −1 yr −1 ; (ii) single application of the equivalent N–P as inorganic fertilization (260 kg N ha −1 yr −1 and 57 kg P ha −1 yr −1 ); (iii) identical to (ii), but with split N application; and (iv) no fertilization. Corn grain and silage yields, N–P–K plant concentration, and uptake were significantly increased by manure or inorganic fertilizer addition relative to the control. During the 4‐yr corn experiment, the amounts of available NO 3 –N in the soil profile of manure plots were higher than control, but similar to both inorganic fertilization treatments. Manure application maintained the amounts of soil available NO 3 –N, P, and K at desirable levels, almost each year of the total 8‐yr application. However, soil organic C and Kjeldahl N remained unchanged. At the end of the experiment, soil salinity below 30 cm was significantly increased on manure or inorganic fertilizer addition relative to the control, but at levels acceptable for most crops. In conclusion, soil application of liquid dairy cattle manure at a rate equivalent to the recommended inorganic fertilization can enhance corn yield and composition and maintain soil fertility at desirable levels, without increasing soil salinity at unacceptable levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure or inorganic fertilizer addition significantly increased corn grain and silage yields relative to control

Treatment
manure or inorganic fertilizer additione2
Outcome
Corn grain and silage yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Mediterranean environmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“conducted under a Mediterranean environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–185 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corn grain and silage yields, N–P–K plant concentration, and uptake were significantly increased by manure or inorganic fertilizer addition relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure or inorganic fertilizer addition significantly increased corn N–P–K plant concentration and uptake relative to control

Treatment
manure or inorganic fertilizer additione2
Outcome
N–P–K plant concentration, and uptakee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Mediterranean environmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“conducted under a Mediterranean environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–185 · show in text ↑
e2

“Corn grain and silage yields, N–P–K plant concentration, and uptake were significantly increased by manure or inorganic fertilizer addition relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plots had higher soil available NO3–N in the soil profile than control

Treatment
manuree3
Outcome
available NO 3 –Ne3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“the amounts of available NO 3 –N in the soil profile of manure plots were higher than control, but similar to both inorganic fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plots had soil available NO3–N similar to both inorganic fertilization treatments

Treatment
manuree3
Outcome
available NO 3 –Ne3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
both inorganic fertilization treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“the amounts of available NO 3 –N in the soil profile of manure plots were higher than control, but similar to both inorganic fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application maintained soil available NO3–N, P and K at desirable levels

Treatment
Manure applicatione4
Outcome
soil available NO 3 –N, P, and Ke4
Direction
maintainede4
Qualifier
at desirable levelse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Manure application maintained the amounts of soil available NO 3 –N, P, and K at desirable levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic C and Kjeldahl N remained unchanged under manure application

Treatment
Manure applicatione4
Outcome
soil organic C and Kjeldahl Ne5
Direction
remained unchangede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Manure application maintained the amounts of soil available NO 3 –N, P, and K at desirable levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1182 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, soil organic C and Kjeldahl N remained unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure or inorganic fertilizer addition significantly increased soil salinity below 30 cm relative to control, at levels acceptable for most crops

Treatment
manure or inorganic fertilizer additione6
Outcome
soil salinity below 30 cme6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
at levels acceptable for most cropse6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on corn ( Zea mays L.) yield and composition were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“soil salinity below 30 cm was significantly increased on manure or inorganic fertilizer addition relative to the control, but at levels acceptable for most crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1482 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of liquid dairy cattle manure at a rate equivalent to recommended inorganic fertilization is recommended to enhance corn yield without increasing soil salinity at unacceptable levels

Outcome
soil application of liquid dairy cattle manure at a rate equivalent to the recommended inorganic fertilizatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“soil application of liquid dairy cattle manure at a rate equivalent to the recommended inorganic fertilization can enhance corn yield and composition and maintain soil fertility at desirable levels, without increasing soil salinity at unacceptable levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1753 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.