Abstract
In 1979 a Nonpareil-Price almond orchard, was planted 2.2m × 6.7m (270 trees/acre). Four pruning treatments were imposed on the hedgerow planting at the end of the first year. 1. Interplanted: Trees trained to 3 scaffolds then standard pruned 2nd-6th years. Alternate trees were whisked back during 7th and 8th years and whisked trees removed after 9th year. 2. Permanent Hedge: Trees trained to 3 scaffolds and standard pruned throughout. 3. Two Scaffold Hedge: Heavy 2nd and 3rd year training required to form 2 main scaffolds growing into the row middles then standard pruned. 4. Unpruned Hedge: Trees trained to 3 scaffolds then no further pruning. Treatment with alternate trees whisked back had 15% reduced yield each year following whisking. Removing these heavily pruned alternate trees at the 9th year then reduced yields an additional 30%. Now, three years after removal, yield still lags by 18%. Accumulating six years yield data shows no differences between the three treatment maintained as hedgerows. However, whisking and removing alternate trees resulted in 2000 lbs less yield over the 6 year period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Whisking alternate trees reduced subsequent annual yield by 15%.
- Taxon
- almond
Prunus dulcist0 - Treatment
- alternate trees whisked backe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 15%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Treatment with alternate trees whisked back had 15% reduced yield each year following whisking.”
t0“ALMONDS”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing heavily pruned alternate trees reduced yield by a further 30%.
- Taxon
- almond
Prunus dulcist0 - Treatment
- Removing these heavily pruned alternate treese0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 30%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Removing these heavily pruned alternate trees at the 9th year then reduced yields an additional 30%.”
t0“ALMONDS”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield remained 18% lower three years after removal.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Now, three years after removal, yield still lags by 18%.”
t0“ALMONDS”
Claim · model-written summary
Six-year yields did not differ among three maintained hedgerow treatments.
- Taxon
- almond
Prunus dulcist0 - Treatment
- three treatment maintained as hedgerowse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no differencese0
- Comparator
- three treatment maintained as hedgerowse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Accumulating six years yield data shows no differences between the three treatment maintained as hedgerows.”
t0“ALMONDS”
Claim · model-written summary
Whisking and removing alternate trees produced 2000 lbs less yield over six years.
- Taxon
- almond
Prunus dulcist0 - Treatment
- whisking and removing alternate treese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 2000 lbse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“whisking and removing alternate trees resulted in 2000 lbs less yield over the 6 year period.”
t0“ALMONDS”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.