Paper · 1990 · HortScience

TRAINING AND PRUNING HEDGEROW ALMONDS

J. Edstrom; W. Krueger; J. Connell; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In 1979 a Nonpareil-Price almond orchard, was planted 2.2m × 6.7m (270 trees/acre). Four pruning treatments were imposed on the hedgerow planting at the end of the first year. 1. Interplanted: Trees trained to 3 scaffolds then standard pruned 2nd-6th years. Alternate trees were whisked back during 7th and 8th years and whisked trees removed after 9th year. 2. Permanent Hedge: Trees trained to 3 scaffolds and standard pruned throughout. 3. Two Scaffold Hedge: Heavy 2nd and 3rd year training required to form 2 main scaffolds growing into the row middles then standard pruned. 4. Unpruned Hedge: Trees trained to 3 scaffolds then no further pruning. Treatment with alternate trees whisked back had 15% reduced yield each year following whisking. Removing these heavily pruned alternate trees at the 9th year then reduced yields an additional 30%. Now, three years after removal, yield still lags by 18%. Accumulating six years yield data shows no differences between the three treatment maintained as hedgerows. However, whisking and removing alternate trees resulted in 2000 lbs less yield over the 6 year period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whisking alternate trees reduced subsequent annual yield by 15%.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
alternate trees whisked backe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with alternate trees whisked back had 15% reduced yield each year following whisking.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALMONDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing heavily pruned alternate trees reduced yield by a further 30%.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
Removing these heavily pruned alternate treese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Removing these heavily pruned alternate trees at the 9th year then reduced yields an additional 30%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALMONDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield remained 18% lower three years after removal.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
removale0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lagse0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Now, three years after removal, yield still lags by 18%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALMONDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-year yields did not differ among three maintained hedgerow treatments.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
three treatment maintained as hedgerowse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
three treatment maintained as hedgerowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulating six years yield data shows no differences between the three treatment maintained as hedgerows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALMONDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whisking and removing alternate trees produced 2000 lbs less yield over six years.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
whisking and removing alternate treese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
2000 lbse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whisking and removing alternate trees resulted in 2000 lbs less yield over the 6 year period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALMONDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.