Paper · 2014 · Journal of Phytopathology

Occurrence of Fusarium langsethiae Strains Isolated from Durum Wheat in Italy

Alessandro Infantino; Alberto Santori; Gabriella Aureli; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Surveys on the occurrence of type A trichothecenes in wheat, and particularly for the T‐2 and HT ‐2 toxins, and information on the biology and epidemiology of the causative Fusarium species (i.e. F. langsethiae , F. sporotrichioides ) are scarce in Italy, as compared to the more common type B trichothecene, deoxynivalenol and its producers. This 4‐year monitoring of phytopathogenic Fusarium species on 183 seed lots of durum wheat shows wide distribution of F. langsethiae in Italy and the potential of several isolates of this fungus to produce high amounts of T‐2 and HT ‐2 in wheat. Fusarium langsethiae was observed for approximately 48% of the analysed samples, with a maximum incidence for a single lot of 10.5%. Fusarium sporotrichioides was observed only in 2011, with an average incidence of 2% (range, 0–3%). A collection of F. langsethiae isolates representative of the main cultivation areas in Italy was established. These isolates showed great variability for their toxin production in vitro . Of 28 strains, all except one isolate can produce the T‐2 and HT ‐2 toxins. HT ‐2 was generally in greater amounts than T‐2, with an average concentration ratio for HT ‐2 to T‐2 of 2.1 (range, 0.7–5.4). The artificial inoculation of wheat with three isolates of F. langsethiae produced no Fusarium head blight symptoms under field conditions. However, significantly higher incidence of F. langsethiae was seen on the kernels of inoculated plants, compared to the uninoculated controls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. langsethiae occurred in approximately 48% of durum wheat samples.

Interactor
Fusarium langsethiaeFusarium langsethiaee0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium langsethiae was observede0
Value
approximately 48%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium langsethiae was observed for approximately 48% of the analysed samples, with a maximum incidence for a single lot of 10.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum F. langsethiae incidence in one wheat lot was 10.5%.

Interactor
Fusarium langsethiaeFusarium langsethiaee0pathogen
Outcome
maximum incidencee0
Value
10.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium langsethiae was observed for approximately 48% of the analysed samples, with a maximum incidence for a single lot of 10.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. sporotrichioides occurred only in 2011, averaging 2% incidence.

Interactor
Fusarium sporotrichioidesFusarium sporotrichioidese0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium sporotrichioides was observede0
Value
2%e0
Qualifier
only in 2011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium sporotrichioides was observed only in 2011, with an average incidence of 2% (range, 0–3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. langsethiae isolates varied greatly in in vitro toxin production.

Outcome
toxin production in vitroe0
Direction
great variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These isolates showed great variability for their toxin production in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All but one of 28 F. langsethiae strains produced T-2 and HT-2 toxins.

Outcome
produce the T‐2 and HT ‐2 toxinse0
Value
28 strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of 28 strains, all except one isolate can produce the T‐2 and HT ‐2 toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HT-2 concentrations generally exceeded T-2, with average ratio 2.1.

Outcome
HT ‐2e0
Direction
greater amountse0
Value
2.1e0
Qualifier
range, 0.7–5.4e0
Comparator
T‐2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT ‐2 was generally in greater amounts than T‐2, with an average concentration ratio for HT ‐2 to T‐2 of 2.1 (range, 0.7–5.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial F. langsethiae inoculation produced no head blight symptoms in wheat under field conditions.

Treatment
artificial inoculation of wheat with three isolates of F. langsethiaee0
Interactor
F. langsethiaeFusarium langsethiaee0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium head blight symptomse0
Direction
noe0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The artificial inoculation of wheat with three isolates of F. langsethiae produced no Fusarium head blight symptoms under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. langsethiae incidence on wheat kernels was significantly higher after inoculation.

Organ / stage
kernelse0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Interactor
F. langsethiaeFusarium langsethiaee0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of F. langsethiaee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher incidence of F. langsethiae was seen on the kernels of inoculated plants, compared to the uninoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑

Fusarium langsethiae · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.