Paper · 1979 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Involvement of Nonhistone Chromosomal Proteins in Transcriptional Activity of Chromatin during Wheat Germination

Kouichi Yoshida; Mamoru Sugita; Kimiko Sasaki

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To clarify how the transcriptionally inactive chromatin of dormant wheat seed embryos becomes active during germination, we studied two kinds of chromatin-associated proteins: histones and nonhistone proteins found in wheat germ.Two major nonhistone proteins were solubilized from purified germ chromatin with 5 molar urea, and were separated from histones and chromosomal RNA by BioRex-70 resin and diethylaminoethyl-cellulose chromatography, respectively. We found that purified 5 molar urea-soluble nonhistone proteins, including the two major nonhistone proteins, had no effect on the transcription of native wheat DNA.Two kinds of chromatins were reconstituted by gradient dialysis from a mixture of DNA, germ histones, and nonhistone proteins derived from germs or germinated seedlings. Reconstituted chromatins had a 1.4- to 1.6-fold higher protein content than DNA content, protein components similar to native chromatin, and had only about 17 to 25% and 37% the transcriptional activities of native seedling and germ chromatins, respectively. Using the transcriptional activity of chromatin reconstituted from DNA and histones alone as a standard, one kind of reconstituted chromatin containing nonhistone proteins of germ was only about one-fourth as active as the standard. Another with nonhistone proteins from seedlings was about 1.3 to 1.5 times more active than the standard.The ratio of histones to DNA content is approximately 1.3 during germination, but the proportion of histone H1 to the total histones is reduced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two major nonhistone proteins were isolated from wheat germ chromatin.

Organ / stage
germe0
Outcome
Two major nonhistone proteinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two major nonhistone proteins were solubilized from purified germ chromatin with 5 molar urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purified urea-soluble nonhistone proteins did not affect transcription of native wheat DNA.

Treatment
purified 5 molar urea-soluble nonhistone proteinse0
Outcome
transcription of native wheat DNAe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“purified 5 molar urea-soluble nonhistone proteins, including the two major nonhistone proteins, had no effect on the transcription of native wheat DNA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–623 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reconstituted chromatins had 1.4- to 1.6-fold more protein than DNA.

Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.4- to 1.6-folde0
Comparator
DNA contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reconstituted chromatins had a 1.4- to 1.6-fold higher protein content than DNA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reconstituted chromatin had protein components similar to native chromatin.

Outcome
protein components similar to native chromatine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“protein components similar to native chromatin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reconstituted chromatins had 17 to 25% of native seedling chromatin transcriptional activity.

Outcome
transcriptional activitiese0
Direction
onlye0
Value
17 to 25%e0
Comparator
native seedlinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“had only about 17 to 25% and 37% the transcriptional activities of native seedling and germ chromatins, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reconstituted chromatins had 37% of native germ chromatin transcriptional activity.

Outcome
transcriptional activitiese0
Direction
onlye0
Value
37%e0
Comparator
germ chromatinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“had only about 17 to 25% and 37% the transcriptional activities of native seedling and germ chromatins, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromatin with germ nonhistone proteins was one-fourth as active as chromatin with DNA and histones alone.

Treatment
nonhistone proteins of germe0
Outcome
transcriptional activitye0
Direction
onlye0
Value
one-fourthe0
Comparator
chromatin reconstituted from DNA and histones alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Using the transcriptional activity of chromatin reconstituted from DNA and histones alone as a standard, one kind of reconstituted chromatin containing nonhistone proteins of germ was only about one-fourth as active as the standard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromatin with seedling nonhistone proteins was 1.3 to 1.5 times as active as the DNA and histone standard.

Treatment
nonhistone proteins from seedlingse0
Outcome
more activee0
Direction
more activee0
Value
1.3 to 1.5 timese0
Comparator
chromatin reconstituted from DNA and histones alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Another with nonhistone proteins from seedlings was about 1.3 to 1.5 times more active than the standard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“chromatin reconstituted from DNA and histones alone as a standard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The histone to DNA ratio was approximately 1.3 during germination.

Organ / stage
germinatione0
Outcome
ratio of histones to DNA contente0
Value
approximately 1.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ratio of histones to DNA content is approximately 1.3 during germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportion of histone H1 among total histones declined during germination.

Gene
histone H1e0
Outcome
proportion of histone H1 to the total histonese0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the proportion of histone H1 to the total histones is reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1534 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 26 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    AlaAT1 and AlaAT2 mRNA levels were lower on nitrogen-free medium.

    Differential regulation of alanine aminotransferase homologues by abiotic stresses in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings · 2012 · compared with light-grown seedlings

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.