Paper · 2000 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Dehydration-Induced Redistribution of Amphiphilic Molecules between Cytoplasm and Lipids Is Associated with Desiccation Tolerance in Seeds

Julia Buitink; Olivier Leprince; Folkert A. Hoekstra

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study establishes a relationship between desiccation tolerance and the transfer of amphiphilic molecules from the cytoplasm into lipids during drying, using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of amphiphilic spin probes introduced into imbibed radicles of pea (Pisum sativum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativa) seeds. Survival following drying and a membrane integrity assay indicated that desiccation tolerance was present during early imbibition and lost in germinated radicles. In germinated cucumber radicles, desiccation tolerance could be re-induced by an incubation in polyethylene glycol (PEG) before drying. In desiccation-intolerant radicles, partitioning of spin probes into lipids during dehydration occurred at higher water contents compared with tolerant and PEG-induced tolerant radicles. The difference in partitioning behavior between desiccation-tolerant and -intolerant tissues could not be explained by the loss of water. Consequently, using a two-phase model system composed of sunflower or cucumber oil and water, physical properties of the aqueous solvent that may affect the partitioning of amphiphilic spin probes were investigated. A significant relationship was found between the partitioning of spin probes and the viscosity of the aqueous solvent. Moreover, in desiccation-sensitive radicles, the rise in cellular microviscosity during drying commenced at higher water contents compared with tolerant or PEG-induced tolerant radicles, suggesting that the microviscosity of the cytoplasm may control the partitioning behavior in dehydrating seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccation tolerance was present during early imbibition and lost in germinated radicles.

Organ / stage
radiclese0
Outcome
desiccation tolerancee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“desiccation tolerance was present during early imbibition and lost in germinated radicles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG incubation restored desiccation tolerance in germinated cucumber radicles.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Organ / stage
radiclese0
Treatment
polyethylene glycol (PEG)e0
Outcome
desiccation tolerancee0
Direction
re-inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In germinated cucumber radicles, desiccation tolerance could be re-induced by an incubation in polyethylene glycol (PEG) before drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spin probes partitioned into lipids at higher water content in intolerant than tolerant radicles.

Organ / stage
radiclese0
Outcome
partitioning of spin probes into lipidse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
tolerant and PEG-induced tolerant radiclese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In desiccation-intolerant radicles, partitioning of spin probes into lipids during dehydration occurred at higher water contents compared with tolerant and PEG-induced tolerant radicles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water loss did not explain the partitioning difference.

Outcome
difference in partitioning behaviore0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in partitioning behavior between desiccation-tolerant and -intolerant tissues could not be explained by the loss of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–950 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spin probe partitioning was significantly related to aqueous solvent viscosity.

Compound
aqueous solvente0
Outcome
partitioning of spin probese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A significant relationship was found between the partitioning of spin probes and the viscosity of the aqueous solvent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1285 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cellular microviscosity rose at higher water content in sensitive than tolerant radicles.

Organ / stage
radiclese0
Outcome
rise in cellular microviscositye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
tolerant or PEG-induced tolerant radiclese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“in desiccation-sensitive radicles, the rise in cellular microviscosity during drying commenced at higher water contents compared with tolerant or PEG-induced tolerant radicles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1471 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest cytoplasmic microviscosity may control partitioning in dehydrating seeds.

Taxon
seedse0
Outcome
partitioning behaviore0
Qualifier
microviscosity of the cytoplasme0

Verbatim

e0

“the microviscosity of the cytoplasm may control the partitioning behavior in dehydrating seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1584 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.