Paper · 2009 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

The Rice Aquaporin Lsi1 Mediates Uptake of Methylated Arsenic Species

Ren-Ying Li; Yukiko Ago; Wen-Ju Liu; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
409
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pentavalent methylated arsenic (As) species such as monomethylarsonic acid [MMA(V)] and dimethylarsinic acid [DMA(V)] are used as herbicides or pesticides, and can also be synthesized by soil microorganisms or algae through As methylation. The mechanism of MMA(V) and DMA(V) uptake remains unknown. Recent studies have shown that arsenite is taken up by rice (Oryza sativa) roots through two silicon transporters, Lsi1 (the aquaporin NIP2;1) and Lsi2 (an efflux carrier). Here we investigated whether these two transporters also mediate the uptake of MMA(V) and DMA(V). MMA(V) was partly reduced to trivalent MMA(III) in rice roots, but only MMA(V) was translocated to shoots. DMA(V) was stable in plants. The rice lsi1 mutant lost about 80% and 50% of the uptake capacity for MMA(V) and DMA(V), respectively, compared with the wild-type rice, whereas Lsi2 mutation had little effect. The short-term uptake kinetics of MMA(V) can be described by a Michaelis-Menten plus linear model, with the wild type having 3.5-fold higher V(max) than the lsi1 mutant. The uptake kinetics of DMA(V) were linear with the slope being 2.8-fold higher in the wild type than the lsi1 mutant. Heterologous expression of Lsi1 in Xenopus laevis oocytes significantly increased the uptake of MMA(V) but not DMA(V), possibly because of a very limited uptake of the latter. Uptake of MMA(V) and DMA(V) by wild-type rice was increased as the pH of the medium decreased, consistent with an increasing proportion of the undissociated species. The results demonstrate that Lsi1 mediates the uptake of undissociated methylated As in rice roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MMA(V) was partly reduced to MMA(III) in rice roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
MMA(V) was partly reduced to trivalent MMA(III) in rice rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MMA(V) was partly reduced to trivalent MMA(III) in rice roots, but only MMA(V) was translocated to shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only MMA(V) was translocated to shoots.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
MMA(V) was translocated to shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MMA(V) was partly reduced to trivalent MMA(III) in rice roots, but only MMA(V) was translocated to shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMA(V) was stable in plants.

Outcome
DMA(V) was stable in plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“DMA(V) was stable in plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lsi1 mutant lost about 80% of MMA(V) uptake versus wild type.

Material
rice lsi1 mutante0
Treatment
lsi1 mutante0
Gene
lsi1e0
Outcome
uptake capacity for MMA(V)e0
Direction
loste0
Value
about 80%e0
Comparator
wild-type ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice lsi1 mutant lost about 80% and 50% of the uptake capacity for MMA(V) and DMA(V), respectively, compared with the wild-type rice, whereas Lsi2 mutation had little effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lsi1 mutant lost 50% of DMA(V) uptake versus wild type.

Material
rice lsi1 mutante0
Treatment
lsi1 mutante0
Gene
lsi1e0
Outcome
DMA(V)e0
Direction
loste0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
wild-type ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice lsi1 mutant lost about 80% and 50% of the uptake capacity for MMA(V) and DMA(V), respectively, compared with the wild-type rice, whereas Lsi2 mutation had little effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lsi2 mutation had little effect on methylated arsenic uptake.

Treatment
Lsi2 mutatione0
Gene
Lsi2e0
Outcome
uptake capacity for MMA(V) and DMA(V)e0
Direction
little effecte0
Comparator
wild-type ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice lsi1 mutant lost about 80% and 50% of the uptake capacity for MMA(V) and DMA(V), respectively, compared with the wild-type rice, whereas Lsi2 mutation had little effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–884 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild type had 3.5-fold higher V(max) for MMA(V) uptake than lsi1.

Outcome
V(max)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.5-folde0
Comparator
lsi1 mutante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The short-term uptake kinetics of MMA(V) can be described by a Michaelis-Menten plus linear model, with the wild type having 3.5-fold higher V(max) than the lsi1 mutant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–8 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMA(V) uptake slope was 2.8-fold higher in wild type than lsi1.

Outcome
slopee0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.8-folde0
Comparator
lsi1 mutante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake kinetics of DMA(V) were linear with the slope being 2.8-fold higher in the wild type than the lsi1 mutant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–8 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lsi1 expression in oocytes increased MMA(V) uptake.

Treatment
Heterologous expression of Lsi1 in Xenopus laevis oocytese0
Gene
Lsi1e0
Outcome
uptake of MMA(V)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“Heterologous expression of Lsi1 in Xenopus laevis oocytes significantly increased the uptake of MMA(V) but not DMA(V), possibly because of a very limited uptake of the latter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lsi1 expression in oocytes did not significantly increase DMA(V) uptake.

Treatment
Heterologous expression of Lsi1 in Xenopus laevis oocytese0
Gene
Lsi1e0
Outcome
DMA(V)e0
Qualifier
possibly because of a very limited uptake of the lattere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–8 · show in text ↑
e0

“Heterologous expression of Lsi1 in Xenopus laevis oocytes significantly increased the uptake of MMA(V) but not DMA(V), possibly because of a very limited uptake of the latter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower medium pH increased MMA(V) uptake in wild-type rice.

Material
wild-type ricee0
Treatment
pH of the medium decreasede0
Outcome
Uptake of MMA(V)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of MMA(V) and DMA(V) by wild-type rice was increased as the pH of the medium decreased, consistent with an increasing proportion of the undissociated species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1514 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower medium pH increased DMA(V) uptake in wild-type rice.

Material
wild-type ricee0
Treatment
pH of the medium decreasede0
Outcome
DMA(V)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of MMA(V) and DMA(V) by wild-type rice was increased as the pH of the medium decreased, consistent with an increasing proportion of the undissociated species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1514 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lsi1 mediates uptake of undissociated methylated arsenic in rice roots.

Gene
Lsi1e0
Outcome
uptake of undissociated methylated As in rice rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrate that Lsi1 mediates the uptake of undissociated methylated As in rice roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1614 · show in text ↑

overexpression · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.