Abstract
Four isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were tested for pathogenicity in IPA-10 variety bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and all were pathogenic. Biological control in vitro was evaluated using eight isolates of Trichoderma spp. and, one of Ulocladium atrum. Chemical control in vitro with fungicides Thiophanate methyl, Iprodione and Carbendazim was also tested. Except U. atrum, all Trichoderma isolates showed antagonistic potential against S. sclerotiorum, where isolate 3601 presented the best performance. Thiophanate methyl chemical control was the most efficient. This fungicide and isolate 3601were compared in vivo in greenhouse. There was statistical difference between the treatments, and the application of fungicide and antagonist before the pathogen was the most efficient approach, reducing the percentage of pathogenicity to 32.94% and 37.04%, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
All four Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates were pathogenic to IPA-10 bean.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Phaseolus vulgarise0 - Material
- IPA-10e0
- Interactor
- Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen - Outcome
- all were pathogenice0
- Value
- Four isolatese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Four isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were tested for pathogenicity in IPA-10 variety bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and all were pathogenic”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested Trichoderma isolates except U. atrum had antagonistic potential against S. sclerotiorum.
- Taxon
- bean plantst0
- Interactor
- S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Trichoderma isolatese0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- antagonistic potentiale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Except U. atrum, all Trichoderma isolates showed antagonistic potential against S. sclerotiorum”
t0“bean plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma isolate 3601 had the best antagonistic performance.
Verbatim
e0“isolate 3601 presented the best performance”
t0“bean plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiophanate methyl was the most efficient chemical control in vitro.
Verbatim
e0“Thiophanate methyl chemical control was the most efficient”
t0“bean plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying fungicide before the pathogen reduced pathogenicity to 32.94%.
- Taxon
- bean plantst0
- Treatment
- application of fungicidee0
- Outcome
- percentage of pathogenicitye0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 32.94%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the application of fungicide and antagonist before the pathogen was the most efficient approach, reducing the percentage of pathogenicity to 32.94% and 37.04%, respectively”
t0“bean plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying antagonist before the pathogen reduced pathogenicity to 37.04%.
- Taxon
- bean plantst0
- Treatment
- antagoniste0
- Outcome
- percentage of pathogenicitye0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 37.04%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the application of fungicide and antagonist before the pathogen was the most efficient approach, reducing the percentage of pathogenicity to 32.94% and 37.04%, respectively”
t0“bean plants”
The same questions in other papers
biocontrol · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fungicide · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.