Paper · 2010 · Tropical Agricultural Research

Biointensive Management of Okra Fruit Borers using Braconid Parasitoids (Braconidae: Hymenoptera)

G Thanavendan; S Jeyarani

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is ravaged by many insect pests from germination to harvest. Sucking pests in the early stage and the fruit borers, Earias vittella Fabricius and Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in the later stage causes extensive damage to fruits causing 69 per cent yield loss. In recent years, increased interest has been shown towards biological control following unsatisfactory results with the application of conventional insecticides. Horticultural crops, chiefly fruit crops, provide a stable environment offering good opportunity for biological control. Hence, investigations were carried out during 2007-2008 to assess the potential of braconid parasitoids against okra fruit borers. The results revealed that the combination of Trichogramma chilonis + Chelonus blackburni + Bracon brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis were more effective to lower larval population of E. vittella and H. armigera which was next to Endosulfan 35 EC after three releases/spray. Similar trend was also observed for per cent fruit damage on both number and weight basis. Combination of T. chilonis + C. blackburni + B. brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis recorded higher yield which was on par with endosulfan 35 EC. The results of the trials widened the scope of utilizing the braconid parasitoids in the biosuppression of fruit borers on okra. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/tar.v21i1.2585 Tropical Agricultural Research Vol. 21(1): 39-50 (2009)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of Trichogramma chilonis, Chelonus blackburni and Bracon brevicornis was more effective in lowering larval populations of E. vittella and H. armigera on okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse1
Treatment
Trichogramma chilonis + Chelonus blackburni + Bracon brevicornise2
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae2pest
Second interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
Outcome
larval population of E. vittella and H. armigerae2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
next to Endosulfan 35 EC after three releases/spraye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · Second interactorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is ravaged by many insect pests from germination to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“the combination of Trichogramma chilonis + Chelonus blackburni + Bracon brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis were more effective to lower larval population of E. vittella and H. armigera which was next to Endosulfan 35 EC after three releases/spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of Chelonus blackburni and Bracon brevicornis was more effective in lowering larval populations of E. vittella and H. armigera on okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse1
Treatment
C. blackburni + B. brevicornise2
Interactor
E. vittellaEarias vittellae2pest
Second interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae2pest
Outcome
larval population of E. vittella and H. armigerae2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
next to Endosulfan 35 EC after three releases/spraye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · Second interactorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is ravaged by many insect pests from germination to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“the combination of Trichogramma chilonis + Chelonus blackburni + Bracon brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis were more effective to lower larval population of E. vittella and H. armigera which was next to Endosulfan 35 EC after three releases/spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The parasitoid combination reduced per cent fruit damage on both number and weight basis in a similar trend to larval reduction.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse1
Treatment
Trichogramma chilonis + Chelonus blackburni + Bracon brevicornise2
Outcome
per cent fruit damage on both number and weight basise3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is ravaged by many insect pests from germination to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“the combination of Trichogramma chilonis + Chelonus blackburni + Bracon brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis were more effective to lower larval population of E. vittella and H. armigera which was next to Endosulfan 35 EC after three releases/spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1001 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similar trend was also observed for per cent fruit damage on both number and weight basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of T. chilonis, C. blackburni and B. brevicornis recorded higher okra yield, on par with endosulfan 35 EC.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse1
Treatment
T. chilonis + C. blackburni + B. brevicornise2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
on par with endosulfan 35 ECe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is ravaged by many insect pests from germination to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Combination of T. chilonis + C. blackburni + B. brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis recorded higher yield which was on par with endosulfan 35 EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of C. blackburni and B. brevicornis recorded higher okra yield, on par with endosulfan 35 EC.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse1
Treatment
C. blackburni + B. brevicornise2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
on par with endosulfan 35 ECe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is ravaged by many insect pests from germination to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Combination of T. chilonis + C. blackburni + B. brevicornis and C. blackburni + B. brevicornis recorded higher yield which was on par with endosulfan 35 EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1249 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the trials widen the scope for using braconid parasitoids in biosuppression of fruit borers on okra.

Outcome
biosuppression of fruit borerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results of the trials widened the scope of utilizing the braconid parasitoids in the biosuppression of fruit borers on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1378 · show in text ↑

Trichogramma chilonis · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichogramma chilonis · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichogramma chilonis · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.