Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

ENRICHMENT OF BASMATI RICE GRAIN AND STRAW WITH ZINC AND NITROGEN THROUGH FERTI-FORTIFICATION AND SUMMER GREEN MANURING UNDER INDO-GANGETIC PLAINS OF INDIA

VIJAY POONIYA; YASHBIR SINGH SHIVAY

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
56
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency is a well-identified problem in cereals, resulting in decreased crop yields and nutritional quality. Approximately half of the world's population suffers from Zn deficiency. Cereal crops play an important role in satisfying daily calorie intake in developing world, but they are inherently very low in grain-Zn concentrations, particularly when grown under Zn-deficient soils. Therefore, it is essential to increase the Zn concentration in cereal grains particularly in basmati rice. Application of Zn fertilizers or Zn-enriched [nitrogen (N)- phosphorus (P)- potassium (K)] fertilizers (ferti-fortification) offers a rapid solution for increasing Zn concentration in grain and straw. The present study was therefore undertaken to study nutrient concentrations in grain and straw, their uptake and use-efficiencies as influenced by summer green manuring (SGM) and Zn fertilization. Field experiments were conducted for two consecutive years during summer and rainy (Kharif) seasons (April–November) of 2008 and 2009; indicated that SGM and Zn fertilization had significant effects on concentrations and uptake of N, K, sulfur (S), Zn, manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) in basmati rice grain and straw. Amongst the SGM and Zn fertilization treatments, Sesbania aculeata green manuring (GM) and 2.0% Zn-enriched urea (ZEU) as zinc sulfate (ZnSO4.H2O) recorded the highest N, K, S, Mn, Cu, and Fe concentrations, and their uptake in grain and straw as well as total (grain + straw) of basmati rice compared to rest of the SGM crops and Zn fertilization treatments. In regards to Zn concentration, foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O) recorded the highest values of Zn concentration in grain and straw viz. 24.1, 24.1 and 177.7, and 179.2 mg kg−1 DM during 2008 and 2009, respectively. Whereas, 2.0% ZEU as ZnSO4.H2O recorded the highest total Zn uptake viz. 3081.6 and 3089.0 g ha−1 in 2008 and 2009, respectively. The estimated values viz. partial factor productivity (PFP) and crop recovery efficiency (CRE) of applied N were the highest with Sesbania aculeata GM and 2.0% ZEU as ZnSO4.H2O treatments. But, the highest physiological efficiency (PE) of applied N was obtained after summer fallow and control (only N) viz. 25.7, 20.1 and 27.1, and 21.9 kg grain kg−1 of N absorbed in 2008 and 2009. All the Zn-use indices were also influenced significantly due to SGM crops and Zn fertilization treatments except ZnHI of basmati rice. Agronomic efficiency (AE) of applied Zn to rice crop was significantly higher with mungbean (Vigna radiata) GM and ZnO slurry Zn fertilization treatment, however, 0.2% foliar spray of ZnSO4.H2O recorded the highest Zn crop recovery efficiency (Zn CRE) viz. 57.6 and 61.6%, respectively. Overall, application of Zn fertilizer (ferti-fortification) to basmati rice through ZEU and foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O) increased Zn concentration in grain and straw, resulting in greater bio-availability of grain Zn. Therefore, this would be a very important and useful strategy in solving the Zn deficiency related problems in Indo-Gangetic plains of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manuring and zinc fertilization significantly affected several nutrient concentrations and uptakes in rice grain and straw.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Organ / stage
grain and strawe0
Treatment
SGM and Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
concentrations and uptake of N, K, sulfur (S), Zn, manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“SGM and Zn fertilization had significant effects on concentrations and uptake of N, K, sulfur (S), Zn, manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), and iron (Fe) in basmati rice grain and straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manure and zinc-enriched urea yielded the highest non-zinc nutrient concentrations and uptake.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Organ / stage
grain and strawe0
Treatment
Sesbania aculeata green manuring (GM) and 2.0% Zn-enriched urea (ZEU) as zinc sulfate (ZnSO4.H2O)e0
Outcome
N, K, S, Mn, Cu, and Fe concentrations, and their uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
rest of the SGM crops and Zn fertilization treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Sesbania aculeata green manuring (GM) and 2.0% Zn-enriched urea (ZEU) as zinc sulfate (ZnSO4.H2O) recorded the highest N, K, S, Mn, Cu, and Fe concentrations, and their uptake in grain and straw as well as total (grain + straw) of basmati rice compared to rest of the SGM crops and Zn fertilization treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc sulfate gave the highest grain zinc concentrations, 24.1 mg kg−1 DM in both years.

Treatment
foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O)e0
Outcome
Zn concentration in graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24.1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O) recorded the highest values of Zn concentration in grain and straw viz. 24.1, 24.1 and 177.7, and 179.2 mg kg−1 DM during 2008 and 2009, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc sulfate gave the highest straw zinc concentrations, 177.7 and 179.2 mg kg−1 DM in 2008 and 2009.

Treatment
foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O)e0
Outcome
Zn concentration in grain and strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
177.7, and 179.2 mg kg−1 DMe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O) recorded the highest values of Zn concentration in grain and straw viz. 24.1, 24.1 and 177.7, and 179.2 mg kg−1 DM during 2008 and 2009, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc-enriched urea gave the highest total zinc uptake in both years.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU as ZnSO4.H2Oe0
Outcome
total Zn uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3081.6 and 3089.0 g ha−1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“2.0% ZEU as ZnSO4.H2O recorded the highest total Zn uptake viz. 3081.6 and 3089.0 g ha−1 in 2008 and 2009, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania green manure plus zinc-enriched urea gave the highest nitrogen partial factor productivity and crop recovery efficiency.

Treatment
Sesbania aculeata GM and 2.0% ZEU as ZnSO4.H2O treatmentse0
Outcome
partial factor productivity (PFP) and crop recovery efficiency (CRE) of applied Ne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“partial factor productivity (PFP) and crop recovery efficiency (CRE) of applied N were the highest with Sesbania aculeata GM and 2.0% ZEU as ZnSO4.H2O treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer fallow and nitrogen-only control gave the highest physiological efficiency of applied nitrogen.

Treatment
summer fallow and control (only N)e0
Outcome
physiological efficiency (PE) of applied Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.7, 20.1 and 27.1, and 21.9 kg grain kg−1 of N absorbede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest physiological efficiency (PE) of applied N was obtained after summer fallow and control (only N) viz. 25.7, 20.1 and 27.1, and 21.9 kg grain kg−1 of N absorbed in 2008 and 2009.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2136–2321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manuring and zinc fertilizer significantly influenced zinc-use indices except zinc harvest index.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
SGM crops and Zn fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
Zn-use indicese0
Qualifier
except ZnHIe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“All the Zn-use indices were also influenced significantly due to SGM crops and Zn fertilization treatments except ZnHI of basmati rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2322–2457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean green manure and zinc oxide slurry gave significantly higher zinc agronomic efficiency.

Taxon
rice cropOryza sativae0
Treatment
mungbean (Vigna radiata) GM and ZnO slurry Zn fertilization treatmente0
Outcome
Agronomic efficiency (AE) of applied Zne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic efficiency (AE) of applied Zn to rice crop was significantly higher with mungbean (Vigna radiata) GM and ZnO slurry Zn fertilization treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2458–2610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc sulfate gave the highest zinc crop recovery efficiency, 57.6 and 61.6%.

Treatment
0.2% foliar spray of ZnSO4.H2Oe0
Outcome
Zn crop recovery efficiency (Zn CRE)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
57.6 and 61.6%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“0.2% foliar spray of ZnSO4.H2O recorded the highest Zn crop recovery efficiency (Zn CRE) viz. 57.6 and 61.6%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2621–2744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude zinc-enriched urea and foliar zinc sulfate increase zinc concentration in grain and straw.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
ZEU and foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O)e0
Outcome
Zn concentration in grain and strawe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of Zn fertilizer (ferti-fortification) to basmati rice through ZEU and foliar spray of 0.2% (ZnSO4.H2O) increased Zn concentration in grain and straw, resulting in greater bio-availability of grain Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2754–2967 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Combined zinc treatment increased zinc uptake in grain to 153.3 g ha-1.

    Effect of foliar application of zinc on biofortified rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2022 · compared with soil application alone and single spray of Zn and most other treatments

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Sesbania bispinosa · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 212 positive, 10 negative or no effect

211 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.