Paper · 2012 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Nitrogen management of fallow crops in Canadian prairie soils

R. E. Karamanos; F. Selles; D. C. James; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Karamanos, R. E., Selles, F., James, D. C. and Stevenson, F. C. 2012. Nitrogen management of fallow crops in Canadian prairie soils. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92: 1389–1401. The ability of fallow to supply nitrogen (N) to crops has been questioned, particularly for crops with greater N requirements. A study was conducted to determine canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) responses to a range of N fertilizer rates (0–75 kg N ha −1 for canola and 0–50 kg N ha −1 for wheat) at 17 fallow sites across Saskatchewan and Alberta, Canada, from 2003 to 2005. Yield and N uptake responses to progressively greater N fertilizer rates were curvilinear for both crops. Maximum yield occurred with 76 kg N ha −1 for canola yield (2190 kg ha −1 ) and 47 kg N ha −1 for wheat (2910 kg ha −1 ). Maximum N uptake occurred at about 90 kg N ha −1 for both crops. Wheat grain yield and N uptake responses were mostly associated with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at anthesis or flag leaf, whereas canola yields and N uptake were most associated with NDVI at five-leaf or bolting, or Cardy Nitrate meter at bolting. The preceding relationships were most apparent at the highest N fertilizer rates. Canola and wheat water use were not affected by N fertilizer rate, but water use efficiency increased linearly for both crops as N fertilizer rate was increased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola yield and N uptake responded curvilinearly to N fertilizer rate.

Treatment
progressively greater N fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
Yield and N uptake responsese0
Direction
curvilineare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and N uptake responses to progressively greater N fertilizer rates were curvilinear for both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield and N uptake responded curvilinearly to N fertilizer rate.

Treatment
progressively greater N fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
Yield and N uptake responsese0
Direction
curvilineare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and N uptake responses to progressively greater N fertilizer rates were curvilinear for both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola maximum yield was 2190 kg ha −1 at 76 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
76 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2190 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield occurred with 76 kg N ha −1 for canola yield (2190 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat maximum yield was 2910 kg ha −1 at 47 kg N ha −1.

Taxon
we1
Treatment
47 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
2910 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“47 kg N ha −1 for wheat (2910 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum yield occurred with 76 kg N ha −1 for canola yield (2190 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum N uptake occurred around 90 kg N ha −1 for canola.

Treatment
90 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum N uptake occurred at about 90 kg N ha −1 for both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum N uptake occurred around 90 kg N ha −1 for wheat.

Treatment
90 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum N uptake occurred at about 90 kg N ha −1 for both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was chiefly associated with NDVI at anthesis or flag leaf.

Organ / stage
anthesis or flag leafe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield and N uptake responses were mostly associated with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at anthesis or flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1002 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat N uptake was chiefly associated with NDVI at anthesis or flag leaf.

Organ / stage
anthesis or flag leafe0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Qualifier
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield and N uptake responses were mostly associated with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at anthesis or flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1002 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola yield was most associated with early NDVI or bolting nitrate readings.

Organ / stage
five-leaf or boltinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
NDVIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola yields and N uptake were most associated with NDVI at five-leaf or bolting, or Cardy Nitrate meter at bolting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola N uptake was most associated with early NDVI or bolting nitrate readings.

Organ / stage
five-leaf or boltinge0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Qualifier
Cardy Nitrate metere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola yields and N uptake were most associated with NDVI at five-leaf or bolting, or Cardy Nitrate meter at bolting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These index relationships were clearest at the highest N rates.

Treatment
highest N fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
preceding relationshipse0
Direction
most apparente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preceding relationships were most apparent at the highest N fertilizer rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola water use was unaffected by N fertilizer rate.

Treatment
N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canola and wheat water use were not affected by N fertilizer rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat water use was unaffected by N fertilizer rate.

Treatment
N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canola and wheat water use were not affected by N fertilizer rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola water use efficiency rose linearly as N rate increased.

Treatment
N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency increased linearly for both crops as N fertilizer rate was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat water use efficiency rose linearly as N rate increased.

Treatment
N fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency increased linearly for both crops as N fertilizer rate was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“fallow crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–388 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.