Paper · 2014 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Inoculation of rapeseed under different rates of inorganic nitrogen and sulfur fertilizer: impact on water relations, cell membrane stability, chlorophyll content and yield

Ali Namvar; Teymur Khandan

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

It is important to develop integrated fertilization strategies for various crops that enhance the competitive ability of the crop, maximize crop production and reduce the risk of nonpoint source pollution from fertilizers. In order to study the effects of mineral nitrogen fertilization and biofertilizer inoculation on yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer, field experiments in factorial scheme based on randomized complete block design were conducted with three replications in 2012 and 2013. Experimental factors were: (1) four levels of chemical nitrogen fertilizer (0, 100, 150 and 200 kg N ha−1), (2) two levels of biofertilizer (with and without inoculation) consisting Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. and (3) two levels of sulfur application (0 and 50 kg S ha−1). Rapeseed yield, oil content of grains and studied physiological traits had a strong association with the N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and sulfur (S) application. Higher rates of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application increased the grain yield of rapeseed. In the case of physiological traits, the highest value of relative water content (RWC) was recorded in 100 kg N ha−1 that was statistically in par with 150 kg N ha−1 application, while usage of 150 kg N ha−1 showed the maximum cell membrane stability (CMS). Inoculation with biofertilizer and S fertilization resulted in higher RWC and CMS in rapeseed plants. The chlorophyll content showed its maximum values in the highest level of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application. The usage of 200 kg N ha−1 significantly decreased the oil content of rapeseed grains, but the highest grain oil content was obtained from the application of 150 kg N ha−1, Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. inoculation and S fertilization. It seems that moderate N rate (about 150 kg N ha−1) and S application (about 50 kg S ha−1) can prove to be beneficial in improving growth, development and total yield of inoculated rapeseed plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilization rates increased rapeseed grain yield.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Higher rates of N fertilizatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher rates of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application increased the grain yield of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation with Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. increased rapeseed grain yield.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
biofertilizer inoculatione2
Interactor
Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume3symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
without inoculatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher rates of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application increased the grain yield of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1142 · show in text ↑
e3

“two levels of biofertilizer (with and without inoculation) consisting Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased rapeseed grain yield.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher rates of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application increased the grain yield of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest relative water content of rapeseed was recorded at 100 kg N ha-1, statistically on par with 150 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
100 kg N ha−1e5
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e5
Direction
highest valuee5
Comparator
150 kg N ha−1e5

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e5

“the highest value of relative water content (RWC) was recorded in 100 kg N ha−1 that was statistically in par with 150 kg N ha−1 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 150 kg N ha-1 gave the maximum cell membrane stability in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
150 kg N ha−1e6
Outcome
cell membrane stability (CMS)e6
Direction
maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e6

“usage of 150 kg N ha−1 showed the maximum cell membrane stability (CMS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation resulted in higher relative water content and cell membrane stability in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Inoculation with biofertilizere7
Outcome
RWC and CMSe7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e7

“Inoculation with biofertilizer and S fertilization resulted in higher RWC and CMS in rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S fertilization resulted in higher relative water content and cell membrane stability in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
S fertilizatione7
Outcome
RWC and CMSe7
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e7

“Inoculation with biofertilizer and S fertilization resulted in higher RWC and CMS in rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen level gave the maximum chlorophyll content in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
highest level of N fertilizatione2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
maximum valuese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll content showed its maximum values in the highest level of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation gave the maximum chlorophyll content in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
biofertilizer inoculatione2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
maximum valuese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll content showed its maximum values in the highest level of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sulfur level gave the maximum chlorophyll content in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
S applicatione2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
maximum valuese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“The chlorophyll content showed its maximum values in the highest level of N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 kg N ha-1 rate significantly decreased rapeseed grain oil content.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
200 kg N ha−1e2
Outcome
oil content of rapeseed grainse2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“The usage of 200 kg N ha−1 significantly decreased the oil content of rapeseed grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 150 kg N ha-1, Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. inoculation and S fertilization gave the highest grain oil content in rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
150 kg N ha−1, Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. inoculation and S fertilizatione2
Interactor
Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere2symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum sp.Azospirillume2symbiont
Outcome
grain oil contente2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest grain oil content was obtained from the application of 150 kg N ha−1, Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. inoculation and S fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1881 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed yield, oil content and physiological traits were strongly associated with N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and sulfur application.

Taxon
Rapeseede2
Treatment
N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and sulfur (S) applicatione2
Outcome
yield, oil content of grains and studied physiological traitse2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rapeseed yield, oil content of grains and studied physiological traits had a strong association with the N fertilization, biofertilizer inoculation and sulfur (S) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1026 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate N (about 150 kg N ha-1) and S (about 50 kg S ha-1) application is recommended to improve growth, development and total yield of inoculated rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
moderate N rate (about 150 kg N ha−1) and S application (about 50 kg S ha−1)e2
Outcome
growth, development and total yielde2

Verbatim

e1

“yield and some physiological traits of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of sulfur fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–431 · show in text ↑
e2

“It seems that moderate N rate (about 150 kg N ha−1) and S application (about 50 kg S ha−1) can prove to be beneficial in improving growth, development and total yield of inoculated rapeseed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–2079 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

64 papers: 31 positive, 33 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.