Paper · 1972 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

WATER UPTAKE OF ROSE ACHENES

FELICITAS SVEJDA

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rose (Rosa rugosa Thunberg) achenes are water permeable. This was shown by the weight increases after immersion into a phosphate buffer. The imbibition curves were typical but, contrary to most imbibing seeds that swell, rose achenes do not increase in size. The water uptake of seeds of intact achenes is impeded. A comparison of intact achenes with achenes that were cut in half showed that the weight increase of cut achenes after immersion in the buffer was significantly higher (P < 0.01) and also that the penetration of stain into the embryos of cut achenes was significantly increased (P < 0.01) after immersion into a 1% eosin solution. The restricted water penetration into seeds of intact achenes is believed to be due to a reduction of the imbibition pressure, caused by an increased wall pressure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose achenes are water permeable.

Taxon
Rose (Rosa rugosa Thunberg)Rosa rugosae0
Outcome
water permeablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa rugosa
Rosa rugosa · TaxonVihljun · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rose (Rosa rugosa Thunberg) achenes are water permeable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose achenes gained weight after immersion in phosphate buffer.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Treatment
immersion into a phosphate buffere0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This was shown by the weight increases after immersion into a phosphate buffer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–136 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSE ACHENES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose achenes did not increase in size during imbibition.

Taxon
rosee0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
do not increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“rose achenes do not increase in size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–258 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake of seeds in intact achenes is impeded.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Organ / stage
seeds of intact achenese0
Outcome
water uptake of seedse0
Direction
impedede0

Verbatim

e0

“The water uptake of seeds of intact achenes is impeded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–314 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSE ACHENES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cut achenes gained significantly more weight than intact achenes after buffer immersion.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Treatment
cut achenese0
Outcome
weight increasee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intact achenese0

Verbatim

e0

“A comparison of intact achenes with achenes that were cut in half showed that the weight increase of cut achenes after immersion in the buffer was significantly higher (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSE ACHENES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cut achenes showed significantly greater stain penetration into embryos than intact achenes.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Organ / stage
embryose0
Treatment
cut achenese0
Outcome
penetration of stain into the embryose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the penetration of stain into the embryos of cut achenes was significantly increased (P < 0.01) after immersion into a 1% eosin solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSE ACHENES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restricted water penetration in intact achenes is attributed to reduced imbibition pressure from increased wall pressure.

Taxon
ROSEt0
Outcome
restricted water penetration into seeds of intact achenese0
Qualifier
reduction of the imbibition pressure, caused by an increased wall pressuree0

Verbatim

e0

“The restricted water penetration into seeds of intact achenes is believed to be due to a reduction of the imbibition pressure, caused by an increased wall pressure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSE ACHENES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑

application · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · growth · RosaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.