Paper · 2006 · Soil Research

Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 induced disease on wheat by the interaction between Pantoea, Exiguobacterium, and Microbacteria

Stephen J. Barnett; David K. Roget; Maarten H. Ryder

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
80
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 is a major wheat root pathogen; however, soils can become suppressive to the expression of disease under intensive cropping with retention of crop residues. This is in part due to the action of soil microorganisms. A step-wise approach was used to determine which microorganisms contributed to suppression of R. solani induced disease in a disease-suppressive soil. Using wheat-soil-pathogen bioassays it was determined that the interaction between 3 phylogenetically diverse groups of bacteria, Pantoea agglomerans, Exiguobacterium acetylicum, and Microbacteria (family Microbacteriaceae), was a major contributor to disease suppression. Inoculation of a sterilised soil with the combination of these groups resulted in greatly increased seedling shoot dry weight and reduced infection compared with diseased control plants with no bacterial inoculation, or inoculated with individual types of bacteria. These groups, however, did not reduce levels of pathogen DNA, although inoculation with suppressive soil (at 10% w/w) did reduce pathogen DNA. Root associated P. agglomerans and E. acetylicum promoted the growth of infected wheat plants and soil associated Microbacteria reduced root infection by R. solani.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three bacterial groups together were a major contributor to wheat disease suppression.

Interactor
Pantoea agglomeransPantoea agglomeranse0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Exiguobacterium acetylicumExiguobacterium acetylicume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Qualifier
Microbacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pantoea agglomerans
Pantoea agglomerans · InteractorDr. Sahay · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the interaction between 3 phylogenetically diverse groups of bacteria, Pantoea agglomerans, Exiguobacterium acetylicum, and Microbacteria (family Microbacteriaceae), was a major contributor to disease suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial inoculation greatly increased wheat seedling shoot dry weight relative to diseased controls and individual inoculations.

Treatment
Inoculation of a sterilised soil with the combination of these groupse0
Outcome
seedling shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
diseased control plants with no bacterial inoculation, or inoculated with individual types of bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation of a sterilised soil with the combination of these groups resulted in greatly increased seedling shoot dry weight and reduced infection compared with diseased control plants with no bacterial inoculation, or inoculated with individual types of bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial inoculation reduced wheat infection relative to diseased controls and individual inoculations.

Treatment
Inoculation of a sterilised soil with the combination of these groupse0
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
diseased control plants with no bacterial inoculation, or inoculated with individual types of bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation of a sterilised soil with the combination of these groups resulted in greatly increased seedling shoot dry weight and reduced infection compared with diseased control plants with no bacterial inoculation, or inoculated with individual types of bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial groups did not reduce pathogen DNA.

Treatment
These groupse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8Rhizoctonia solani AG-8t0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen DNAe0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 induced disease on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“These groups, however, did not reduce levels of pathogen DNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suppressive soil inoculation reduced pathogen DNA.

Treatment
inoculation with suppressive soil (at 10% w/w)e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8Rhizoctonia solani AG-8t0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen DNAe0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 induced disease on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation with suppressive soil (at 10% w/w) did reduce pathogen DNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root associated P. agglomerans promoted growth of infected wheat.

Treatment
P. agglomeranse0
Interactor
P. agglomeransPantoea agglomeranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of infected wheat plantse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pantoea agglomerans
Pantoea agglomerans · InteractorDr. Sahay · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root associated P. agglomerans and E. acetylicum promoted the growth of infected wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root associated E. acetylicum promoted growth of infected wheat.

Treatment
E. acetylicume0
Interactor
E. acetylicumExiguobacterium acetylicume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of infected wheat plantse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root associated P. agglomerans and E. acetylicum promoted the growth of infected wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil associated Microbacteria reduced wheat root infection by R. solani.

Treatment
Microbacteriae0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Microbacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root infection by R. solanie0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil associated Microbacteria reduced root infection by R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1235 · show in text ↑

Pantoea agglomerans · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.