Paper · 1995 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia

DK Roget

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
96
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies of a tillage x rotation field experiment begun in 1978 at Avon, South Australia, have demonstrated a decline in rhizoctonia root rot of wheat. In direct-drilled treatments the severity of rhizoctonia root rot culminated in 1983, with patches of poor plant growth accounting for up to 46% of the crop area, and then declined to negligible levels by 1990. Disease severity was significantly less in cultivated than direct-drilled treatments. In cultivated treatments the onset of decline was more difficult to determine, but by 1990 there was negligible rhizoctonia root rot in either tillage treatment, with no increase in disease from 1990 to 1994. Decline in rhizoctonia root rot occurred largely independent of rotation, although there were significant differences in root damage and patch area between rotations, with disease generally being more severe in wheat following pasture than following peas, medic, or wheat. When inoculum of R. solani was added to soil collected from the experimental site in 1985, wheat grown in soil from direct-drilled plots had significantly less disease than wheat grown in soil from cultivated treatments, indicating a possible development of suppression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia root rot severity in direct-drilled wheat peaked in 1983 and declined to negligible levels by 1990.

Treatment
direct-drilled treatmentse2
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8Rhizoctonia solani AG-8t0pathogen
Outcome
severity of rhizoctonia root rote2
Setting
Avon, South Australiat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e2

“In direct-drilled treatments the severity of rhizoctonia root rot culminated in 1983, with patches of poor plant growth accounting for up to 46% of the crop area, and then declined to negligible levels by 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Patches of poor plant growth covered up to 46% of the crop area in direct-drilled wheat.

Treatment
direct-drilled treatmentse2
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8Rhizoctonia solani AG-8t0pathogen
Outcome
patches of poor plant growthe2
Value
46%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8
Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e2

“In direct-drilled treatments the severity of rhizoctonia root rot culminated in 1983, with patches of poor plant growth accounting for up to 46% of the crop area, and then declined to negligible levels by 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity was significantly lower in cultivated than in direct-drilled wheat.

Treatment
cultivatede4
Outcome
Disease severitye4
Direction
lesse4
Comparator
direct-drilled treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“Disease severity was significantly less in cultivated than direct-drilled treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–446 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 1990 Rhizoctonia root rot was negligible in either tillage treatment, with no increase in disease from 1990 to 1994.

Treatment
either tillage treatmente5
Outcome
negligible rhizoctonia root rote5
Qualifier
no increase in disease from 1990 to 1994e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e5

“by 1990 there was negligible rhizoctonia root rot in either tillage treatment, with no increase in disease from 1990 to 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decline in Rhizoctonia root rot occurred largely independent of rotation.

Treatment
rotatione6
Outcome
Decline in rhizoctonia root rote6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e6

“Decline in rhizoctonia root rot occurred largely independent of rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root rot was more severe in wheat following pasture than following peas, medic or wheat.

Treatment
wheat following pasturee7
Outcome
diseasee7
Direction
more severee7
Comparator
following peas, medic, or wheate7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e7

“with disease generally being more severe in wheat following pasture than following peas, medic, or wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root damage and patch area differed significantly between rotations.

Treatment
rotationse7
Outcome
root damage and patch areae7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e7

“there were significant differences in root damage and patch area between rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grown in soil from direct-drilled plots had significantly less disease than wheat grown in soil from cultivated treatments after R. solani inoculum was added.

Treatment
inoculum of R. solanie7
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie7pathogen
Outcome
diseasee7
Direction
lesse7
Comparator
soil from cultivated treatmentse7
Setting
soil collected from the experimental sitee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Decline in root rot ( Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e7

“When inoculum of R. solani was added to soil collected from the experimental site in 1985, wheat grown in soil from direct-drilled plots had significantly less disease than wheat grown in soil from cultivated treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1149 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

rotation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 20 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

164 papers: 104 positive, 60 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.