Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW

DP Heenan; AC Taylor; BR Cullis; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
49
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A long term field experiment began in 1979 at Wagga Wagga, N.S.W., to compare the sustainability of a range of rotation, tillage and stubble management systems on a red earth. This paper reports yield, yield components and grain protein of wheat for 1979-90. Rotations considered were alternating lupin-wheat (LW), lupin-wheat-wheat (LWW), continuous wheat (WW) with and without N fertilizer (100 kg N/ha), and alternating sub-clover-wheat (CW). Soil N supply at the start of the experiment was high following many years of sub-clover based pasture. From 1979 to 1983, there was a negative grain yield response to N fertilizer and no response to a legume in rotation except in the drought of 1982 when low yields were recorded from LW. Thereafter, a positive grain yield response was usually produced to N fertilizer in WW rotations, until 1989 and 1990, when these crops displayed aluminium toxicity sym ptoms. Overall, average grain yields from legume rotations were higher than WW with added N fertilizer. Since 1983, LW rotations consistently produced higher mean grain yields than CW, but mean grain protein and total N uptake were lower. Yields and N uptake by the second wheat crop in a LWW rotation indicated little carryover of benefits from the lupins. Slightly higher mean grain yield and harvest index, but lower mean grain protein, were produced by direct drilling, compared with cultivation before sowing, following lupins or sub-clover. However, retaining stubble rather than burning in autumn consistently reduced grain yields. There was no evidence that early burial of wheat stubble following summer rain, rather than incorporation in autumn, improved grain yield or total N uptake. The build-up of giant brome grass and diseases, particularly where stubble was retained and crops direct-drilled, casts some doubt on the long term sustainability of these short term rotations in this environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From 1979 to 1983, N fertilizer gave a negative grain yield response compared with continuous wheat without N fertilizer.

Treatment
N fertilizere2
Outcome
grain yield responsee2
Direction
negativee2
Qualifier
From 1979 to 1983e2
Comparator
without N fertilizere1
Setting
southern NSWt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“continuous wheat (WW) with and without N fertilizer (100 kg N/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“From 1979 to 1983, there was a negative grain yield response to N fertilizer and no response to a legume in rotation except in the drought of 1982 when low yields were recorded from LW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From 1979 to 1983, a legume in rotation gave no grain yield response except in the 1982 drought.

Treatment
legume in rotatione2
Outcome
grain yield responsee2
Direction
no responsee2
Qualifier
except in the drought of 1982e2
Setting
southern NSWt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“From 1979 to 1983, there was a negative grain yield response to N fertilizer and no response to a legume in rotation except in the drought of 1982 when low yields were recorded from LW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–734 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 1982 drought, low yields were recorded from LW rotations.

Material
LWe2
Outcome
low yieldse2
Setting
drought of 1982e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“From 1979 to 1983, there was a negative grain yield response to N fertilizer and no response to a legume in rotation except in the drought of 1982 when low yields were recorded from LW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

From 1984 to 1989-1990, N fertilizer usually gave a positive grain yield response in WW rotations.

Treatment
N fertilizere3
Outcome
grain yield responsee3
Direction
positivee3
Qualifier
until 1989 and 1990e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“Thereafter, a positive grain yield response was usually produced to N fertilizer in WW rotations, until 1989 and 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume rotations gave higher average grain yields than WW with added N fertilizer.

Treatment
legume rotationse4
Outcome
average grain yieldse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
WW with added N fertilizere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Overall, average grain yields from legume rotations were higher than WW with added N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Since 1983, LW rotations gave higher mean grain yields than CW.

Treatment
LW rotationse5
Outcome
mean grain yieldse5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
Since 1983e5
Comparator
CWe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“Since 1983, LW rotations consistently produced higher mean grain yields than CW, but mean grain protein and total N uptake were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Since 1983, LW rotations gave lower mean grain protein and total N uptake than CW.

Treatment
LW rotationse5
Outcome
mean grain protein and total N uptakee5
Direction
lowere5
Qualifier
Since 1983e5
Comparator
CWe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“Since 1983, LW rotations consistently produced higher mean grain yields than CW, but mean grain protein and total N uptake were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second wheat crop in a LWW rotation showed little carryover of benefits from the lupins.

Treatment
LWW rotatione6
Outcome
carryover of benefits from the lupinse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“Yields and N uptake by the second wheat crop in a LWW rotation indicated little carryover of benefits from the lupins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct drilling gave slightly higher mean grain yield and harvest index than cultivation before sowing, following lupins or sub-clover.

Treatment
direct drillinge7
Outcome
mean grain yield and harvest indexe7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
following lupins or sub-clovere7
Comparator
cultivation before sowinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“Slightly higher mean grain yield and harvest index, but lower mean grain protein, were produced by direct drilling, compared with cultivation before sowing, following lupins or sub-clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct drilling gave lower mean grain protein than cultivation before sowing, following lupins or sub-clover.

Treatment
direct drillinge7
Outcome
mean grain proteine7
Direction
lowere7
Qualifier
following lupins or sub-clovere7
Comparator
cultivation before sowinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“Slightly higher mean grain yield and harvest index, but lower mean grain protein, were produced by direct drilling, compared with cultivation before sowing, following lupins or sub-clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining stubble rather than burning in autumn consistently reduced grain yields.

Treatment
retaining stubblee1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in autumne1
Comparator
burninge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, retaining stubble rather than burning in autumn consistently reduced grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early burial of wheat stubble after summer rain did not improve grain yield or total N uptake compared with autumn incorporation.

Treatment
early burial of wheat stubblee1
Outcome
grain yield or total N uptakee1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
following summer raine1
Comparator
incorporation in autumne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no evidence that early burial of wheat stubble following summer rain, rather than incorporation in autumn, improved grain yield or total N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giant brome grass and disease build-up occurred where stubble was retained and crops were direct-drilled.

Treatment
stubble was retained and crops direct-drillede1
Interactor
giant brome grasse1weed
Outcome
build-up of giant brome grass and diseasese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The build-up of giant brome grass and diseases, particularly where stubble was retained and crops direct-drilled, casts some doubt on the long term sustainability of these short term rotations in this environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium toxicity symptoms appeared in these crops in 1989 and 1990.

Outcome
aluminium toxicitye1
Qualifier
until 1989 and 1990e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“when these crops displayed aluminium toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–900 · show in text ↑
e2

“Thereafter, a positive grain yield response was usually produced to N fertilizer in WW rotations, until 1989 and 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–853 · show in text ↑

transplanting · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

rotation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.