Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete

Claim · model-written summary

Symptoms similar to brown root rot were noticed in tomato and eggplant in Crete, appearing only during the winter.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0

Outcome

Symptomse0

Qualifier

only during the wintere1

Setting

Cretee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e0

“Symptoms similar to those regarded as typical of brown root rot disease have been noticed in tomato and eggplant in Crete”

e1

“Infected plants showed symptoms only during the winter”

Claim · model-written summary

Three fungi isolated from infected tomato roots were pathogenic to young tomato seedlings.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicume2

Interactor

Pyrenochaeta lycopersiciPseudopyrenochaeta lycopersicie2pathogen

Second interactor

Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume2pathogen

Outcome

pathogenic to young tomato seedlingse2

Qualifier

Colletotrichum coccodese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e2

“Three fungi Pyrenochaeta lycopersici, Colletotrichum coccodes and Fusarium oxysporum were consistently isolated from infected tomato roots and proved to be pathogenic to young tomato seedlings”

Claim · model-written summary

Pycnidia of P. lycopersici were produced when infected young tomato roots were plated on tomato juice agar and incubated under white light.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicume3

Treatment

plated out on tomato juice agare3

Interactor

P. lycopersiciPseudopyrenochaeta lycopersicie3pathogen

Outcome

Pycnidia of P. lycopersicie3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

e3

“Pycnidia of P. lycopersici were produced when small pieces of infected young tomato roots were plated out on tomato juice agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 23 °C under continuous white light”

Claim · model-written summary

Good control of brown root rot was achieved by soil fumigation with dazomet 98%.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 )e5

Outcome

control of the diseasee5

Direction

Good controle5

Setting

Cretet0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e5

“Good control of the disease was achieved when soil was fumigated with dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 ), methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80% (‐Di‐Trapex; 50 ml/m 2 ), methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 ), and vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) or when solarisation was applied (soil covered by 50 μm transparent polyethylene sheet) during the whole period of August and September”

Claim · model-written summary

Good control of brown root rot was achieved by soil fumigation with methyl isothiocyanate and dichloropropene mixture.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80%e5

Outcome

control of the diseasee5

Direction

Good controle5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e5

“Good control of the disease was achieved when soil was fumigated with dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 ), methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80% (‐Di‐Trapex; 50 ml/m 2 ), methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 ), and vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) or when solarisation was applied (soil covered by 50 μm transparent polyethylene sheet) during the whole period of August and September”

Claim · model-written summary

Good control of brown root rot was achieved by soil fumigation with methyl bromide.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 )e5

Outcome

control of the diseasee5

Direction

Good controle5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e5

“Good control of the disease was achieved when soil was fumigated with dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 ), methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80% (‐Di‐Trapex; 50 ml/m 2 ), methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 ), and vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) or when solarisation was applied (soil covered by 50 μm transparent polyethylene sheet) during the whole period of August and September”

Claim · model-written summary

Good control of brown root rot was achieved by vapam with ethoprophos soil treatment.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 )e5

Outcome

control of the diseasee5

Direction

Good controle5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e5

“Good control of the disease was achieved when soil was fumigated with dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 ), methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80% (‐Di‐Trapex; 50 ml/m 2 ), methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 ), and vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) or when solarisation was applied (soil covered by 50 μm transparent polyethylene sheet) during the whole period of August and September”

Claim · model-written summary

Good control of brown root rot was achieved by soil solarisation during August and September.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

solarisatione5

Outcome

control of the diseasee5

Direction

Good controle5

Qualifier

during the whole period of August and Septembere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e5

“Good control of the disease was achieved when soil was fumigated with dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 ), methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80% (‐Di‐Trapex; 50 ml/m 2 ), methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 ), and vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) or when solarisation was applied (soil covered by 50 μm transparent polyethylene sheet) during the whole period of August and September”

Claim · model-written summary

Dazomet or ethoprophos combined with solarisation did not improve the effectiveness of solarisation alone.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

Dazomet (30 g/m 2 )e6

Outcome

effectivenesse6

Direction

did not improvee6

Qualifier

when combined with solarisatione6

Comparator

solarisatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e6

“Dazomet (30 g/m 2 ) or ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) when combined with solarisation did not improve its effectiveness”

Claim · model-written summary

Emulsified MIC 20% + DD 80% was ineffective for control of brown root rot.

Taxon

tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0

Treatment

MIC 20%+ DD 80% emulsified (Di‐Trapex e.c, 50 ml/m 2 )e7

Outcome

control of the diseasee5

Direction

ineffectivee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim

t0

“Brown root rot of tomato, and its control, in Crete”

e5

“Good control of the disease was achieved when soil was fumigated with dazomet 98% (70g/m 2 ), methyl isothiocyanate (MIC) 20%+ dichloropropane‐dichloropropene mixture (DD) 80% (‐Di‐Trapex; 50 ml/m 2 ), methyl bromide (75 g/m 2 ), and vapam (200 ml/m 2 ) + ethoprophos 10% (10 g/m 2 ) or when solarisation was applied (soil covered by 50 μm transparent polyethylene sheet) during the whole period of August and September”

e7

“MIC 20%+ DD 80% emulsified (Di‐Trapex e.c, 50 ml/m 2 ) was ineffective”