Abstract
In order to study the effects different concentration of humic acid and acetic acid foliar application on yield and leaves nutrient content of grape (Vitis vinifera), a field experimental in randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted in 2010. Foliar application treatments were T1: Control, T2: Acetic acid (1000 mg kg-1), T3: Humic acid (300 mg kg-1), T4: Acetic acid (1000 mg kg-1) + Humic acid (300 mg kg-1). Obtained results showed that: Spray treatments had significant effect on yield, cluster length and diameter and Iron, Potassium and Phosphor leaves content of grape. Maximum and minimum amount of fruits yield was obtained in T3 (Humic acid) and T1(Control) treatments respectively. Highest amount of length and diameter of grape cluster and leaves Iron content was recorded in T4 (Acetic acid) + Humic acid) but maximum of phosphor and potassium was recorded in T3 (Acetic acid) and minimum amount of all characters was recorded in T1 (Control). Key words: Humic acid, acetic acid, zinc, foliar application, grape, yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Spray treatments had a significant effect on grape yield, cluster length and cluster diameter.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“leaves nutrient content of grape”
e1“Spray treatments had significant effect on yield, cluster length and diameter and Iron, Potassium and Phosphor leaves content of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Spray treatments had a significant effect on leaf iron, potassium and phosphorus content of grape.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“leaves nutrient content of grape”
e1“Spray treatments had significant effect on yield, cluster length and diameter and Iron, Potassium and Phosphor leaves content of grape”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid (T3) gave the maximum fruit yield, and the control (T1) the minimum.
Verbatim
e0“leaves nutrient content of grape”
e2“Maximum and minimum amount of fruits yield was obtained in T3 (Humic acid) and T1(Control) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 (acetic acid plus humic acid) gave the highest cluster length and diameter and leaf iron content in grape.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- T4 (Acetic acid) + Humic acide3
- Outcome
- length and diameter of grape cluster and leaves Iron contente3
- Direction
- Higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“leaves nutrient content of grape”
e3“Highest amount of length and diameter of grape cluster and leaves Iron content was recorded in T4 (Acetic acid) + Humic acid)”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 (acetic acid) gave the maximum phosphorus and potassium content in grape leaves.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“leaves nutrient content of grape”
e4“maximum of phosphor and potassium was recorded in T3 (Acetic acid)”
Claim · model-written summary
The control (T1) gave the minimum amount of all characters in grape.
Verbatim
e0“leaves nutrient content of grape”
e5“minimum amount of all characters was recorded in T1 (Control)”
The same questions in other papers
acetic acid · growth · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
83 papers more in this group
See all 87 papers →other · growth · VitisResults agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.