Abstract
Abstract In the years 2008–2015, field experiments were conducted on the vines of cultivars ‘Solaris’ and ‘Regent’ grafted on SO4 rootstock. The following treatments: 1. control (untreated), 2. NPK (mineral fertilization 70 kg N·ha −1 ; 40 kg P·ha −1 ; 120 kg K·ha −1 ), 3. mycorrhizal substrate (AMF – Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi), 4. NPK + AMF, 5. manure (before planting), 6. NPK + manure (before planting), 7. Bioilsa, 8. NPK + Bioilsa, 9. BF-Ecomix, 10. NPK + BF-Ecomix, 11. Ausma and 12. NPK + Ausma were applied to evaluate the usefulness of biostimulants and mineral and organic fertilizers in organic grapevine production in “cool climate” conditions of Poland. The tests did not show a definite positive effect of the biostimulants and organic fertilizers on growth, yielding and healthiness of the cultivars ‘Solaris’ and ‘Regent’. There were no substantial differences in total marketable yield in the years 2009 to 2015 between control and other treatments. Grapevines planted in soil rich in minerals grew and yielded well despite no mineral fertilization for a number of years. In 2014, when the air humidity was high during vegetation, intensive rotting of the berries of cultivar ‘Solaris’, caused by Botrytis cinerea , was observed on plants fertilized with NPK.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulants and organic fertilizers had no definite positive effect on growth, yielding and healthiness of grapevine.
- Material
- ‘Solaris’ and ‘Regent’e1
- Treatment
- biostimulants and organic fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- growth, yielding and healthinesse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- controle0
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1. control (untreated)”
e1“The tests did not show a definite positive effect of the biostimulants and organic fertilizers on growth, yielding and healthiness of the cultivars ‘Solaris’ and ‘Regent’”
t0“Grapevine Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Total marketable yield did not differ between control and other treatments in 2009 to 2015.
- Treatment
- other treatmentse2
- Outcome
- total marketable yielde2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1. control (untreated)”
e2“There were no substantial differences in total marketable yield in the years 2009 to 2015 between control and other treatments”
t0“Grapevine Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Grapevines grew and yielded well in soil rich in minerals without mineral fertilization for several years.
- Outcome
- grew and yielded welle3
- Qualifier
- despite no mineral fertilization for a number of yearse3
- Setting
- soil rich in mineralse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Grapevines planted in soil rich in minerals grew and yielded well despite no mineral fertilization for a number of years”
t0“Grapevine Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive berry rotting of cultivar Solaris was observed on NPK-fertilized plants in a humid year.
- Material
- ‘Solaris’e4
- Treatment
- fertilized with NPKe4
- Interactor
- Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinereae4pathogen - Outcome
- intensive rotting of the berriese4
- Qualifier
- when the air humidity was high during vegetatione4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“In 2014, when the air humidity was high during vegetation, intensive rotting of the berries of cultivar ‘Solaris’, caused by Botrytis cinerea , was observed on plants fertilized with NPK”
t0“Grapevine Cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →other · yield · VitisPositive and negative results
22 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.