Paper · 1998 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Influence of UV-B radiation and Cd2+ on chlorophyll fluorescence, growth and nutrient content in Brassica napus

E. H. Larsson; J. F. Bornman; H. Asp

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
179
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The possible interaction of two stresses, UV-B radiation and cadmium, applied simultaneously, was investigated in Brassica napus L. cv. Paroll with respect to chlorophyll fluorescence, growth and uptake of selected elements. Plants were grown in nutrient solution containing CdCl2, (0, 0.5, 2 or 5 μM) and irradiated with photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 400–700 nm, 800 μmol m−2 s−1) with or without supplemental ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280–320 nm, 15 kJ m−2 d−1, weighted irradiance). After 14 d of treatment, the most pronounced effects were found at 2 and 5 μM CdCl2 with and without supplemental UV-B radiation. Exposure to cadmium significantly increased the amount of Cd in both roots and shoots. In addition, increases occurred in the concentration of Fe, Zn, Cu, and P in roots, while K was reduced. In shoots the S content rose significantly both in the presence and absence of UV-B radiation, while significant increases in Mg, Ca, P, Cu, and K occurred only in plants exposed to Cd and UV-B radiation. Manganese decreased significantly under the combined exposure treatment. The rise in S content may have been due to stimulated glutathione and phytochelatin synthesis. Cadmium exposure significantly decreased root dry weight, leaf area, total chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, and the photochemical quantum yield of photosynthesis. As an estimation of energy dissipation processes in photosynthesis, non photochemical quenching (qNPQ) was measured using a pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer. The qNPQ increased with increasing Cd, while the combination of cadmium and UV-B reduced the qNPQ compared to that in plants exposed only to cadmium or UV-B radiation. The chlorophyll a : b ratio showed a reduction with UV-B at no or low Cd concentrations (0 μM, 0.5 μM CdCl2), but not at the higher Cd concentrations used (2 μM, 5 μM CdCl2). Thus in some instances there appeared to be a UV-B and Cd interaction, while in others plant response could be attributed to either treatment alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased Cd in roots and shoots.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
cadmiume0
Outcome
amount of Cd in both roots and shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to cadmium significantly increased the amount of Cd in both roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased Fe, Zn, Cu, and P concentrations in roots.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
cadmiume1
Outcome
concentration of Fe, Zn, Cu, and P in rootse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases occurred in the concentration of Fe, Zn, Cu, and P in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–802 · show in text ↑
e1

“cadmium significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced root K.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
cadmiume1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while K was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exposure to cadmium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot S rose with and without UV-B during cadmium exposure.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
cadmiume1
Outcome
S contente0
Direction
rosee0
Qualifier
both in the presence and absence of UV-B radiatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In shoots the S content rose significantly both in the presence and absence of UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exposure to cadmium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg, Ca, and P increased in shoots only with combined cadmium and UV-B.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cd and UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
Mg, Ca, Pe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases in Mg, Ca, P, Cu, and K occurred only in plants exposed to Cd and UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu and K increased in shoots only with combined cadmium and UV-B.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cd and UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
Cu, and Ke0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases in Mg, Ca, P, Cu, and K occurred only in plants exposed to Cd and UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cadmium and UV-B decreased manganese.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cd and UV-B radiatione1
Outcome
Manganesee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese decreased significantly under the combined exposure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd and UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced root dry weight and leaf area.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cadmium exposuree0
Outcome
root dry weight, leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium exposure significantly decreased root dry weight, leaf area, total chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, and the photochemical quantum yield of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced chlorophyll and carotenoid content.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cadmium exposuree0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content, carotenoid contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium exposure significantly decreased root dry weight, leaf area, total chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, and the photochemical quantum yield of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced photochemical quantum yield.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
Cadmium exposuree0
Outcome
photochemical quantum yield of photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium exposure significantly decreased root dry weight, leaf area, total chlorophyll content, carotenoid content, and the photochemical quantum yield of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonphotochemical quenching rose with increasing Cd.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
increasing Cde0
Outcome
qNPQe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The qNPQ increased with increasing Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cadmium and UV-B reduced qNPQ versus either exposure alone.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
combination of cadmium and UV-Be0
Outcome
qNPQe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
plants exposed only to cadmium or UV-B radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of cadmium and UV-B reduced the qNPQ compared to that in plants exposed only to cadmium or UV-B radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced the chlorophyll a:b ratio at no or low Cd concentrations.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
chlorophyll a : b ratioe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
no or low Cd concentrations (0 μM, 0.5 μM CdCl2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll a : b ratio showed a reduction with UV-B at no or low Cd concentrations (0 μM, 0.5 μM CdCl2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not reduce the chlorophyll a:b ratio at higher Cd concentrations.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
UV-Be1
Outcome
chlorophyll a : b ratioe1
Qualifier
higher Cd concentrations used (2 μM, 5 μM CdCl2)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not at the higher Cd concentrations used (2 μM, 5 μM CdCl2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1873 · show in text ↑
e1

“The chlorophyll a : b ratio showed a reduction with UV-B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

uv · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.