Paper · 1993 · Physiologia Plantarum

The effect of exposure to enhanced UV‐B radiation on the penetration of monochromatic and polychromatic UV‐B radiation in leaves of Brassica napus

Yan‐Ping Cen; Janet F. Bornman

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
206
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using quartz optical fibres, penetration of both monochromatic (310 nm) and polychromatic UV‐B (280–320 nm) radiation in leaves of Brassica napus L. (cv. Ceres) was measured. Plants were grown under either visible light (750 μmol m −2 s −1 photosynthetically active radiation) or with the addition of 8. 9 KJ m −2 day −1 biologically effective UV‐B (UV‐B BE ) radiation. Results showed that of the 310 nm radiation that penetreated the leaf, 90% was within the intial one third of the leaf with high attenuation in the leaf epidermis, especially in UV‐treated plants. Polychromatic UV‐B radiation, relative to incident radiation, showed a relatively uniform spectral distribution within the leaf, except for collimated radiation. Over 30% of the UV‐screening pigments in the leaf, including flavonoids, were found in the adaxial epidermal layer, making this layer less transparent to UV‐B radiation than the abaxial epidermis, which contained less than 12% of the UV‐screening pigments. UV‐screening pigments increased by 20% in UV‐treated leaves relative to control leaves. Densely arranged epicuticular wax on the adaxial leaf surface of UV‐treated plants may have further decreased penetration of UV‐B radiation by reflectance. An increased leaf thickness, and decreases in leaf area and leaf dry weight were also found for UV‐treated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most penetrating 310 nm radiation was confined to the first third of the leaf, with strong epidermal attenuation especially after UV treatment.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
leaf epidermise0
Outcome
310 nm radiatione1
Value
90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90% was within the intial one third of the leaf with high attenuation in the leaf epidermis, especially in UV‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“310 nm radiation that penetreated the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–440 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polychromatic UV-B had a relatively uniform internal spectral distribution except for collimated radiation.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Outcome
relatively uniform spectral distributione0
Qualifier
except for collimated radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polychromatic UV‐B radiation, relative to incident radiation, showed a relatively uniform spectral distribution within the leaf, except for collimated radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over 30% of leaf UV-screening pigments occurred in the adaxial epidermis.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
adaxial epidermal layere0
Outcome
UV‐screening pigmentse0
Value
Over 30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 30% of the UV‐screening pigments in the leaf, including flavonoids, were found in the adaxial epidermal layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The adaxial epidermis was less transparent to UV-B than the abaxial epidermis, which held under 12% of screening pigments.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Outcome
transparent to UV‐B radiatione0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
less than 12%e0
Comparator
abaxial epidermise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“making this layer less transparent to UV‐B radiation than the abaxial epidermis, which contained less than 12% of the UV‐screening pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV treatment increased leaf UV-screening pigments by 20% relative to controls.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
UV‐treatede0
Outcome
UV‐screening pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
control leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV‐screening pigments increased by 20% in UV‐treated leaves relative to control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dense adaxial epicuticular wax in UV-treated plants may further reduce UV-B penetration by reflectance.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
adaxial leaf surfacee0
Outcome
penetration of UV‐B radiatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
by reflectancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Densely arranged epicuticular wax on the adaxial leaf surface of UV‐treated plants may have further decreased penetration of UV‐B radiation by reflectance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated leaves were thicker.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
UV‐treated plantse0
Outcome
leaf thicknesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increased leaf thickness, and decreases in leaf area and leaf dry weight were also found for UV‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated plants had less leaf area and leaf dry weight.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
UV‐treated plantse0
Outcome
leaf area and leaf dry weighte0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increased leaf thickness, and decreases in leaf area and leaf dry weight were also found for UV‐treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–146 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

uv · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.