Paper · 2005 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The role of ozone flux and antioxidants in the suppression of ozone injury by elevated CO2 in soybean

Fitzgerald L. Booker; Edwin L. Fiscus

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The projected rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration is expected to increase growth and yield of many agricultural crops. The magnitude of this stimulus will partly depend on interactions with other components of the atmosphere such as tropospheric O3. Elevated CO2 concentrations often lessen the deleterious effects of O3, but the mechanisms responsible for this response have received little direct examination. Previous studies have indicated that protection against O3 injury by elevated CO2 can be attributed to reduced O3 uptake, while other studies suggest that CO2 effects on anti-oxidant metabolism might also be involved. The aim of this experiment was to test further the roles of O3 flux and antioxidant metabolism in the suppression of O3 injury by elevated CO2. In a two-year experiment, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was exposed from emergence to maturity to charcoal-filtered air or charcoal-filtered air plus a range of O3 concentrations in combination with ambient or approximately twice-ambient CO2 concentrations in open-top field chambers. Experimental manipulation of O3 concentrations and estimates of plant O3 uptake indicated that equivalent O3 fluxes that suppressed net photosynthesis, growth, and yield at ambient concentrations of CO2 were generally much less detrimental to plants treated concurrently with elevated CO2. These responses appeared unrelated to treatment effects on superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and peroxidase activities and glutathione concentration. Total ascorbic acid concentration increased by 28-72% in lower canopy leaves in response to elevated CO2 and O3 but not in upper canopy leaves. Increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO2 will likely ameliorate O3 damage to many crops due to reduced O3 uptake, increased carbon assimilation, and possibly as yet undetermined additional factors. The results of this study further suggest that elevated CO2 may increase the threshold O3 flux for biomass and yield loss in soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equivalent ozone fluxes, elevated CO2 reduced detrimental effects on net photosynthesis, growth and yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
net photosynthesis, growth, and yielde0
Direction
much less detrimentale0
Comparator
ambient concentrations of CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“equivalent O3 fluxes that suppressed net photosynthesis, growth, and yield at ambient concentrations of CO2 were generally much less detrimental to plants treated concurrently with elevated CO2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protective response appeared unrelated to superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase and peroxidase activities.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and peroxidasee0
Outcome
These responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These responses appeared unrelated to treatment effects on superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and peroxidase activities and glutathione concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protective response appeared unrelated to glutathione concentration.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Compound
glutathione concentratione0
Outcome
These responsese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These responses appeared unrelated to treatment effects on superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and peroxidase activities and glutathione concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and O3 increased lower-canopy ascorbic acid concentration by 28-72%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
lower canopy leavese0
Treatment
elevated CO2 and O3e0
Outcome
Total ascorbic acid concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28-72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total ascorbic acid concentration increased by 28-72% in lower canopy leaves in response to elevated CO2 and O3 but not in upper canopy leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-canopy leaves did not show the ascorbic acid increase.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
upper canopy leavese0
Treatment
elevated CO2 and O3e0
Outcome
Total ascorbic acid concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total ascorbic acid concentration increased by 28-72% in lower canopy leaves in response to elevated CO2 and O3 but not in upper canopy leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–101 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer elevated CO2 may raise the ozone-flux threshold for soybean biomass and yield loss.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
threshold O3 flux for biomass and yield losse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO2 may increase the threshold O3 flux for biomass and yield loss in soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–1994 · show in text ↑

ozone · quality: phytochemicals · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

64 papers: 50 positive, 14 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.