Abstract
SUMMARY In 1969, apple scab was controlled equally well by spraying at 14 or 28 day intervals with benomyl (0.025 per cent a.i.). Triarimol (0.004 per cent a.i.) at 14‐day intervals was even more effective and also surpassed benomyl in controlling apple mildew. In 1970, when the dry summer prevented apple scab development, triarimol apphed at 10‐day intervals again provided the best control of apple mildew. Sprays of thiophanate (NF 35) (0.05 per cent a.i.) and thiophanate‐methyl (NF 44) (0.05 per cent a.i.) applied at 10‐day intervals were no better than the standard captan/dinocap programme, but triarimol and benomyl at 21‐day intervals were less effective.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Benomyl sprays at 14 and 28 day intervals controlled apple scab equally well in 1969.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- benomyl (0.025 per cent a.i.)e0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- controlled equally welle0
- Comparator
- 14 or 28 day intervalse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 1969, apple scab was controlled equally well by spraying at 14 or 28 day intervals with benomyl (0.025 per cent a.i.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Triarimol at 14 day intervals controlled apple scab more effectively than benomyl in 1969.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- Triarimol (0.004 per cent a.i.) at 14‐day intervalse0
- Outcome
- apple scabe1
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- benomyl (0.025 per cent a.i.)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Triarimol (0.004 per cent a.i.) at 14‐day intervals was even more effective”
e1“In 1969, apple scab was controlled equally well by spraying at 14 or 28 day intervals with benomyl (0.025 per cent a.i.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Triarimol surpassed benomyl in control of apple mildew.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Triarimol (0.004 per cent a.i.) at 14‐day intervalse1
- Outcome
- apple mildewe0
- Direction
- surpassede0
- Comparator
- benomyle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“also surpassed benomyl in controlling apple mildew”
e1“Triarimol (0.004 per cent a.i.) at 14‐day intervals”
Claim · model-written summary
Triarimol applied at 10 day intervals gave the best apple mildew control in 1970.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- triarimol apphed at 10‐day intervalse0
- Outcome
- control of apple mildewe0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 1970, when the dry summer prevented apple scab development, triarimol apphed at 10‐day intervals again provided the best control of apple mildew.”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiophanate at 10 day intervals was no better than the standard captan/dinocap program.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- thiophanate (NF 35) (0.05 per cent a.i.)e0
- Outcome
- Control of Scab and Powdery Mildewt0
- Direction
- no bettere0
- Comparator
- standard captan/dinocap programmee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sprays of thiophanate (NF 35) (0.05 per cent a.i.) and thiophanate‐methyl (NF 44) (0.05 per cent a.i.) applied at 10‐day intervals were no better than the standard captan/dinocap programme”
t0“Control of Scab and Powdery Mildew of Apple”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiophanate-methyl at 10 day intervals was no better than the standard captan/dinocap program.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- thiophanate‐methyl (NF 44) (0.05 per cent a.i.)e0
- Outcome
- Control of Scab and Powdery Mildewt0
- Direction
- no bettere0
- Comparator
- standard captan/dinocap programmee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sprays of thiophanate (NF 35) (0.05 per cent a.i.) and thiophanate‐methyl (NF 44) (0.05 per cent a.i.) applied at 10‐day intervals were no better than the standard captan/dinocap programme”
t0“Control of Scab and Powdery Mildew of Apple”
Claim · model-written summary
Triarimol at 21 day intervals was less effective than the standard captan/dinocap program.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- triarimole0
- Outcome
- Control of Scab and Powdery Mildewt0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
- Comparator
- standard captan/dinocap programmee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but triarimol and benomyl at 21‐day intervals were less effective”
e1“standard captan/dinocap programme”
t0“Control of Scab and Powdery Mildew of Apple”
Claim · model-written summary
Benomyl at 21 day intervals was less effective than the standard captan/dinocap program.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- benomyl at 21‐day intervalse0
- Outcome
- Control of Scab and Powdery Mildewt0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
- Comparator
- standard captan/dinocap programmee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but triarimol and benomyl at 21‐day intervals were less effective”
e1“standard captan/dinocap programme”
t0“Control of Scab and Powdery Mildew of Apple”
The same questions in other papers
thiophanate-methyl · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →benomyl · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.