Paper · 2004 · Weed & Turfgrass Science

Weed Control Efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Penoxsulam Granule (DE-638, DASH-1100) in Transplanted Rice Paddy in Korea

Yi-Ki Min; Richard K. Mann

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This report summarizes the field trials results of penoxsulam(DE-638, DASH-1100, 2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N-(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-6-trifluoromethyl) benzenesulfonamide) granule(GR) conducted at 12 locations in Korea from 2000 to 2002. Penoxsulam GR at 24, 30, 36 and 72 g ai ha-1, was applied at 5, 10 and 15 days after transplanting (DAT), when the growth stage of Echinochloa crus-galli(ECHCG) is pre-emergence, 1.5 to 2.0, and 3 to 4 leaves, respectively. Pyrazosulfuron+molinate (0.07+5%) GR at 21+1,500 g ai ha-1 was used as the commercial standard. In terms of weed control, penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product. Penoxsulam GR at 36 g ai provided excellent control of 3-leaf stage ECHCG and performed better than the standard, while control of Eleocharis kuroguwai(ELOKU) and Ludwigia prostrata(LUDPR) was slightly lower than that of the standard product. In terms of rice safety, penoxsulam GR when applied at 5 DAT with 36 and 72 g ai ha-1 inhibited rice growth visually by 10 to 20% at 20 to 30 days after application(DAA). When applied at 10 or 15 DAT, penoxsulam GR showed slight growth inhibition only at the highest rate(72 g ai ) at 10 to 20 DAA. Despite this early phytotoxicity, rice fully recovered after 40 to 45 DAA, and there was no significant influence grain yield at any application time or rate

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 30 g ai applied 10 to 15 DAT controlled Echinochloa crus-galli through the three-leaf stage as well as the standard product.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g aie0
Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie1weed
Outcome
control of ECHCGe0
Direction
good to excellente0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinochloa crus-galli(ECHCG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 30 g ai controlled Monochoria vaginalis as well as the standard product.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g aie0
Interactor
Monochoria vaginalise0weed
Outcome
control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA)e0
Direction
good to excellente0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 30 g ai controlled Bidens tripartita as well as the standard product.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g aie0
Interactor
Bidens tripartitaBidens tripartitae0weed
Outcome
control of ECHCGe0
Direction
good to excellente0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bidens tripartita
Bidens tripartita · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 30 g ai controlled Lindernia pyxidaria as well as the standard product.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g aie0
Interactor
Lindernia pyxidariae0weed
Outcome
control of ECHCGe0
Direction
good to excellente0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 30 g ai controlled Scirpus juncoides as well as the standard product.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g aie0
Interactor
Scirpus juncoidesSchoenoplectiella juncoidese0weed
Outcome
control of ECHCGe0
Direction
good to excellente0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Schoenoplectiella juncoides
Schoenoplectiella juncoides · InteractorDavid Eickhoff from Pearl City, Hawaii, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 30 g ai controlled Cyperus serotinus as well as the standard product.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g aie0
Interactor
Cyperus serotinusCyperus serotinuse0weed
Outcome
control of ECHCGe0
Direction
good to excellente0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus serotinus
Cyperus serotinus · InteractorKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR applied at 10 to 15 DAT with 30 g ai provided good to excellent control of ECHCG (up to 3 leaf stage), Monochoria vaginalis(MOOVA), Bidens tripartita(BIDTR), Lindernia pyxidaria(LIDPY), Scirpus juncoides(SCPJU) and Cyperus serotinus(CYPSE), and the performance was equal to the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 36 g ai controlled three-leaf Echinochloa crus-galli better than the standard.

Treatment
Penoxsulam GR at 36 g aie0
Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie1weed
Outcome
control of 3-leaf stage ECHCGe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
standarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penoxsulam GR at 36 g ai provided excellent control of 3-leaf stage ECHCG and performed better than the standard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinochloa crus-galli(ECHCG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam controlled Eleocharis kuroguwai slightly less well than the standard.

Treatment
Penoxsulam GR at 36 g aie1
Interactor
Eleocharis kuroguwaiEleocharis kuroguwaie0weed
Outcome
control of Eleocharis kuroguwaie0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eleocharis kuroguwai
Eleocharis kuroguwai · InteractorShow_ryu · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of Eleocharis kuroguwai(ELOKU) and Ludwigia prostrata(LUDPR) was slightly lower than that of the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penoxsulam GR at 36 g ai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam controlled Ludwigia prostrata slightly less well than the standard.

Treatment
Penoxsulam GR at 36 g aie1
Interactor
Ludwigia prostrataLudwigia prostratae0weed
Outcome
control of Eleocharis kuroguwai(ELOKU) and Ludwigia prostratae0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Comparator
standard producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ludwigia prostrata
Ludwigia prostrata · InteractorDalgial · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of Eleocharis kuroguwai(ELOKU) and Ludwigia prostrata(LUDPR) was slightly lower than that of the standard product.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“Penoxsulam GR at 36 g ai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam at 36 and 72 g ai ha-1 applied five DAT visually inhibited rice growth 10 to 20% at 20 to 30 DAA.

Treatment
penoxsulam GR when applied at 5 DAT with 36 and 72 g ai ha-1e0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
10 to 20%e0
Qualifier
20 to 30 days after application(DAA)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“penoxsulam GR when applied at 5 DAT with 36 and 72 g ai ha-1 inhibited rice growth visually by 10 to 20% at 20 to 30 days after application(DAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 or 15 DAT, only the 72 g ai rate caused slight rice growth inhibition at 10 to 20 DAA.

Treatment
penoxsulam GRe0
Outcome
growth inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
only at the highest rate(72 g ai ) at 10 to 20 DAAe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied at 10 or 15 DAT, penoxsulam GR showed slight growth inhibition only at the highest rate(72 g ai ) at 10 to 20 DAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice recovered fully from early penoxsulam phytotoxicity after 40 to 45 DAA.

Outcome
rice fully recoverede0
Value
40 to 45 DAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite this early phytotoxicity, rice fully recovered after 40 to 45 DAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam had no significant influence on rice grain yield at any application time or rate.

Treatment
penoxsulam GRe1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant influencee0
Qualifier
at any application time or ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant influence grain yield at any application time or rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“When applied at 10 or 15 DAT, penoxsulam GR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1376 · show in text ↑

Penoxsulam · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Penoxsulam · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

87 papers: 75 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Penoxsulam · Ludwigia prostrata · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Penoxsulam · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Penoxsulam · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Penoxsulam · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Penoxsulam · Bidens tripartita · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Penoxsulam · Schoenoplectiella juncoides · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.