Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OFVIGNA RADIATAL. TO VARIED DOSES OF CHLORPYRIFOS

Talat Parween; Sumira Jan; Mahmooduzzafar; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Twenty-day old seedlings were exposed to different concentrations ranging from 0–1.5 mM of chlorpyrifos through foliar spray in the field condition. The seedlings were uprooted for analyses and observed at the preflowering (five days after treatment, DAT), flowering (10 DAT) and post-flowering (20 DAT) stages for various morphological parameters such as plant height, number of branches, leaves per plant, total leaf area, plant biomass and photosynthetic pigments viz. Chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, Total Chl, and Carotenoid (Car) content. Yield attributing characters like number of pods plant−1, number of seeds pod−1 and weight of 100 seeds were analyzed from both control and treated plant after harvest stage. All the growth parameters, pigments’ activity and yield parameters increased at 0.3 mM insecticidal treatment, when compared with control. Further increases in insecticide level had a negative impact upon all studied parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3 mM chlorpyrifos foliar spray, growth parameters increased relative to control.

Taxon
VIGNA RADIATALt0
Treatment
0.3 mM insecticidal treatmente2
Outcome
growth parameterse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field conditione1

Verbatim

t0

“DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OFVIGNA RADIATAL. TO VARIED DOSES OF CHLORPYRIFOS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“through foliar spray in the field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the growth parameters, pigments’ activity and yield parameters increased at 0.3 mM insecticidal treatment, when compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3 mM chlorpyrifos foliar spray, pigments’ activity increased relative to control.

Taxon
VIGNA RADIATALt0
Treatment
0.3 mM insecticidal treatmente2
Outcome
pigments’ activitye2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field conditione1

Verbatim

t0

“DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OFVIGNA RADIATAL. TO VARIED DOSES OF CHLORPYRIFOS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“through foliar spray in the field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the growth parameters, pigments’ activity and yield parameters increased at 0.3 mM insecticidal treatment, when compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3 mM chlorpyrifos foliar spray, yield parameters increased relative to control.

Taxon
VIGNA RADIATALt0
Treatment
0.3 mM insecticidal treatmente2
Outcome
yield parameterse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
field conditione1

Verbatim

t0

“DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OFVIGNA RADIATAL. TO VARIED DOSES OF CHLORPYRIFOS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“through foliar spray in the field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the growth parameters, pigments’ activity and yield parameters increased at 0.3 mM insecticidal treatment, when compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide increases above 0.3 mM had a negative impact on all studied parameters.

Taxon
VIGNA RADIATALt0
Treatment
Further increases in insecticide levele3
Outcome
all studied parameterse3
Direction
negative impacte3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OFVIGNA RADIATAL. TO VARIED DOSES OF CHLORPYRIFOS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“Further increases in insecticide level had a negative impact upon all studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–943 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

insecticide · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.