Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in greengram to evaluate the compatibility of pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicides. A total of 9 treatments were tested to study the phytotoxic effects of combination of pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicides. The treatments include, five insecticides (Imidachlorprid @ 0.1% (For sucking pest), Chlorpyriphos @ 0.25% (Foliage feeder), Chlorantriniprole @ 100 ml/acre (For pod borer) and 2 fungicides viz., Mancozeb 0.2% (For fungal disease), Copper oxy chloride 0.25% (For bacterial disease) and their 7 combinations along with untreated control. Also tested in combination with fungicides viz.,Mancozeb 0.2% (For fungal disease) and Copper oxy chloride 0.25% (For bacterial disease). Laboratory experiment was also conducted to evaluate the physical compatibility. Physical compatibility test was conducted prior to field study to observe changes in colour, wettability etc., Among 7 combinations of pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicides tested neither foaming nor sedimentation was observed in all 7 combinations of pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicides tested and found to be physically compatible. As the foaming and sedimentation was lower than the prescribed limit (2ml/100ml or 20ml/l), all the combinations of pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicides tested were found to be physically compatible. In the field experiment pulse wonder alone improves the plant growth, flower production, pod number and yield. Whereas pulse wonder along with insecticide and pesticide reduces the pest and disease load but not the flower production and pod number.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
All seven Pulse Wonder combinations were physically compatible, with no foaming or sedimentation.
- Taxon
- greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicidese0
- Outcome
- physically compatiblee0
- Value
- 7 combinationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“neither foaming nor sedimentation was observed in all 7 combinations of pulse wonder with insecticides and fungicides tested and found to be physically compatible”
t0“Greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulse Wonder alone improved greengram plant growth.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- pulse wonder alonee0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- improvese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pulse wonder alone improves the plant growth, flower production, pod number and yield”
t0“Greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulse Wonder alone improved greengram flower production and pod number.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- pulse wonder alonee0
- Outcome
- flower production, pod numbere0
- Direction
- improvese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pulse wonder alone improves the plant growth, flower production, pod number and yield”
t0“Greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulse Wonder alone improved greengram yield.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- pulse wonder alonee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pulse wonder alone improves the plant growth, flower production, pod number and yield”
t0“Greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulse Wonder with insecticide and pesticide reduced greengram pest and disease load.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- pulse wonder along with insecticide and pesticidee0
- Outcome
- pest and disease loade0
- Direction
- reducese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pulse wonder along with insecticide and pesticide reduces the pest and disease load but not the flower production and pod number”
t0“Greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulse Wonder with insecticide and pesticide did not reduce greengram flower production or pod number.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- pulse wonder along with insecticide and pesticidee0
- Outcome
- flower production and pod numbere0
- Direction
- note0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pulse wonder along with insecticide and pesticide reduces the pest and disease load but not the flower production and pod number”
t0“Greengram”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.