Paper · 2014 · Botanical studies

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase salt tolerance of apple seedlings

Shou-Jun Yang; Zhong-Lan Zhang; Yuan-Xia Xue; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Apple trees are often subject to severe salt stress in China as well as in the world that results in significant loss of apple production. Therefore this study was carried out to evaluate the response of apple seedlings inoculated with abuscular mycorrhizal fungi under 0, 2‰, 4‰ and 6‰ salinity stress levels and further to conclude the upper threshold of mycorrhizal salinity tolerance. Results The results shows that abuscular mycorrhizal fungi significantly increased the root length colonization of mycorrhizal apple plants with exposure time period to 0, 2‰ and 4‰ salinity levels as compared to non-mycorrhizal plants, however, percent root colonization reduced as saline stress increased. Salinity levels were found to negatively correlate with leaf relative turgidity, osmotic potential irrespective of non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal apple plants, but the decreased mycorrhizal leaf turgidity maintained relative normal values at 2‰ and 4‰ salt concentrations. Under salt stress condition, Cl − and Na + concentrations clearly increased and K + contents obviously decreased in non-mycorrhizal roots in comparison to mycorrhizal plants, this caused mycorrhizal plants had a relatively higher K + /Na + ratio in root. In contrast to zero salinity level, although ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities in non-inoculated and inoculated leaf improved under all saline levels, the extent of which these enzymes increased was greater in mycorrhizal than in non-mycorrhizal plants. The numbers of survived tree with non-mycorrhization were 40, 20 and 0 (i.e., 66.7%, 33.3% and 0) on the days of 30, 60 and 90 under 4‰ salinity, similarly in mycorrhization under 6‰ salinity 40, 30 and 0 (i.e., 66.7%, 50% and 0) respectively. Conclusion These results suggest that 2‰ and 4‰ salt concentrations may be the upper thresholds of salinity tolerance in non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal apple plants, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal apple roots had significantly greater colonization at 0, 2‰ and 4‰ salinity than non-mycorrhizal roots.

Treatment
abuscular mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
abuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
root length colonizatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“abuscular mycorrhizal fungi significantly increased the root length colonization of mycorrhizal apple plants with exposure time period to 0, 2‰ and 4‰ salinity levels as compared to non-mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–644 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root colonization declined as salinity increased.

Treatment
saline stresse0
Outcome
percent root colonizatione0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent root colonization reduced as saline stress increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity correlated negatively with leaf relative turgidity and osmotic potential.

Treatment
Salinity levelse0
Outcome
leaf relative turgidity, osmotic potentiale0
Direction
negatively correlatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity levels were found to negatively correlate with leaf relative turgidity, osmotic potential irrespective of non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal apple plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal leaf turgidity remained relatively normal at 2‰ and 4‰ salt.

Treatment
2‰ and 4‰ salt concentrationse0
Outcome
mycorrhizal leaf turgiditye0
Direction
maintained relative normal valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased mycorrhizal leaf turgidity maintained relative normal values at 2‰ and 4‰ salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, non-mycorrhizal roots accumulated more Cl − and Na + than mycorrhizal roots.

Treatment
non-mycorrhizale0
Outcome
Cl − and Na + concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cl − and Na + concentrations clearly increased and K + contents obviously decreased in non-mycorrhizal roots in comparison to mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, non-mycorrhizal roots had lower K + content than mycorrhizal roots.

Treatment
non-mycorrhizale0
Outcome
K + contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K + contents obviously decreased in non-mycorrhizal roots in comparison to mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal roots had a relatively higher K + /Na + ratio.

Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse0
Outcome
K + /Na + ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal plants had a relatively higher K + /Na + ratio in root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased leaf ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities in both inoculated and non-inoculated plants.

Treatment
all saline levelse0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activitiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities in non-inoculated and inoculated leaf improved under all saline levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased the two leaf enzyme activities more in mycorrhizal than non-mycorrhizal plants.

Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Outcome
these enzymese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
non-mycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the extent of which these enzymes increased was greater in mycorrhizal than in non-mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4‰ salinity, non-mycorrhizal trees had 40, 20 and 0 survivors at 30, 60 and 90 days.

Treatment
4‰ salinitye0
Outcome
numbers of survived treee0
Value
40, 20 and 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The numbers of survived tree with non-mycorrhization were 40, 20 and 0 (i.e., 66.7%, 33.3% and 0) on the days of 30, 60 and 90 under 4‰ salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6‰ salinity, mycorrhizal trees had 40, 30 and 0 survivors at 30, 60 and 90 days.

Treatment
6‰ salinitye0
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Value
40, 30 and 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in mycorrhization under 6‰ salinity 40, 30 and 0 (i.e., 66.7%, 50% and 0) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1753 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 2‰ and 4‰ as salt tolerance thresholds for non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal apple plants, respectively.

Outcome
upper thresholds of salinity tolerancee0
Value
2‰ and 4‰e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2‰ and 4‰ salt concentrations may be the upper thresholds of salinity tolerance in non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal apple plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1934 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: enzyme activity · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.