Paper · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Influence of glutathione (GSH) on net uptake of sulphate and sulphate transport in tobacco plants

Cornelia Herschbach; Heinz Rennenberg

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
129
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Net uptake of sulphate by the roots, and its transport to the shoot was inhibited in intact tobacco plants by 1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSH. The relative amount of sulphate taken up that was transported to the shoot was not affected by this treatment. Apparently, sulphate uptake, but not xylem loading of sulphate, was inhibited by GSH. Similar results were obtained when L-cysteine was used instead of GSH. As L-cysteine, mediated inhibition of sulphate, net uptake was counteracted by exposure of the roots to BSO, GSH synthesis seems to be required for inhibition of sulphate uptake by L-cysteine. However, exposure to 0.1 or 1.0mM GSH did not result In an enhanced GSH level in roots or shoots. Also the cysteine contents remained unchanged. Small changes in metabolically active pools of GSH or cysteine seem to be responsible for the inhibition of sulphate uptake and its transport to the shoot. Flap-feeding of GSH to a mature leaf resulted in an inhibition of net uptake of sulphate by the roots and its transport to the shoot. These findings support the hypothesis that GSH produced in the leaves acts as a signal to control sulphur nutrition of plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root GSH exposure inhibited sulphate uptake in tobacco.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSHe0
Outcome
Net uptake of sulphate by the rootse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net uptake of sulphate by the roots, and its transport to the shoot was inhibited in intact tobacco plants by 1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root GSH exposure inhibited sulphate transport to the shoot in tobacco.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacume0
Treatment
1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSHe0
Outcome
transport to the shoote0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net uptake of sulphate by the roots, and its transport to the shoot was inhibited in intact tobacco plants by 1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root GSH exposure did not change the relative share of absorbed sulphate transported to shoots.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacume1
Treatment
1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSHe1
Outcome
relative amount of sulphate taken up that was transported to the shoote0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative amount of sulphate taken up that was transported to the shoot was not affected by this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–267 · show in text ↑
e1

“intact tobacco plants by 1 h exposure of its roots to 0.1 or 1.0 mM GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-cysteine exposure likewise inhibited tobacco sulphate uptake and transport.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacume1
Treatment
L-cysteinee0
Outcome
Net uptake of sulphate by the roots, and its transport to the shoote1
Comparator
GSHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were obtained when L-cysteine was used instead of GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–424 · show in text ↑
e1

“Net uptake of sulphate by the roots, and its transport to the shoot was inhibited in intact tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSO counteracted L-cysteine-mediated inhibition of sulphate uptake.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
exposure of the roots to BSOe0
Outcome
sulphate, net uptakee0
Direction
counteractede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L-cysteine, mediated inhibition of sulphate, net uptake was counteracted by exposure of the roots to BSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSH root exposure did not raise GSH levels in roots or shoots.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
exposure to 0.1 or 1.0mM GSHe0
Outcome
GSH level in roots or shootse0
Direction
did not result In an enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exposure to 0.1 or 1.0mM GSH did not result In an enhanced GSH level in roots or shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cysteine contents remained unchanged after GSH exposure.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
exposure to 0.1 or 1.0mM GSHe1
Outcome
cysteine contentse0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also the cysteine contents remained unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“exposure to 0.1 or 1.0mM GSH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding GSH to a mature leaf inhibited root sulphate uptake and shoot transport.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
Flap-feeding of GSH to a mature leafe0
Outcome
net uptake of sulphate by the roots and its transport to the shoote0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flap-feeding of GSH to a mature leaf resulted in an inhibition of net uptake of sulphate by the roots and its transport to the shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that leaf-produced GSH signals control of plant sulphur nutrition.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome
sulphur nutrition of plantse0
Qualifier
acts as a signale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GSH produced in the leaves acts as a signal to control sulphur nutrition of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 · show in text ↑

glutathione · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

L-cysteine · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

glutathione · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.