Paper · 2000 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Applications in food quality and environmental contamination

Éva Lehoczky; Péter Marth; Ilona Szabados; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types. The effect of single lime applications a year, was followed in two consecutive years. Soil pH increased in both soils types in response to liming. There was no significant difference between the two doses of lime. On the Mollic Fluvisol soil (S2), increased plant biomass production was observed in the year of liming while growth reductions were found in the next year. On the Eutric Fluvisol soil (S1), no difference was found in plant weight in the first year. In the second year, significant decreases in fresh and dry weight were also found in limed treatments compared to control. Cd uptake by lettuce was reduced by liming in both years on the Eutric Fluvisol soil, but only in the second year on the Mollic Fluvisol soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming reduced Cd uptake by lettuce in both years on the Eutric Fluvisol soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
liminge1
Outcome
Cd uptakee1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in both yearse1
Setting
Eutric Fluvisol soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd uptake by lettuce was reduced by liming in both years on the Eutric Fluvisol soil, but only in the second year on the Mollic Fluvisol soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming reduced Cd uptake by lettuce only in the second year on the Mollic Fluvisol soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
liminge1
Outcome
Cd uptakee1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
only in the second yeare1
Setting
Mollic Fluvisol soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd uptake by lettuce was reduced by liming in both years on the Eutric Fluvisol soil, but only in the second year on the Mollic Fluvisol soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased soil pH in both soil types.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
liminge2
Outcome
Soil pHe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil pH increased in both soils types in response to liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased lettuce biomass production in the year of liming on the Mollic Fluvisol soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
liminge3
Outcome
plant biomass productione3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
in the year of liminge3
Setting
Mollic Fluvisol soil (S2)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the Mollic Fluvisol soil (S2), increased plant biomass production was observed in the year of liming while growth reductions were found in the next year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming reduced lettuce growth in the year after liming on the Mollic Fluvisol soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
liminge3
Outcome
growthe3
Direction
reductionse3
Qualifier
in the next yeare3
Setting
Mollic Fluvisol soil (S2)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the Mollic Fluvisol soil (S2), increased plant biomass production was observed in the year of liming while growth reductions were found in the next year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, limed treatments decreased fresh and dry weight of lettuce compared with control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
limed treatmentse5
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte5
Direction
decreasese5
Qualifier
In the second yeare5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the second year, significant decreases in fresh and dry weight were also found in limed treatments compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming produced no difference in lettuce plant weight in the first year on the Eutric Fluvisol soil.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
plant weighte4
Direction
no differencee4
Qualifier
in the first yeare4
Setting
Eutric Fluvisol soil (S1)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e4

“On the Eutric Fluvisol soil (S1), no difference was found in plant weight in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two lime doses did not differ significantly.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
two doses of limee6
Outcome
difference between the two dosese6
Direction
no significant differencee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effects of liming on Cd uptake by lettuce grown in two different soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–158 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was no significant difference between the two doses of lime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–372 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

lime · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.