Paper · 1992 · Physiologia Plantarum

Intraspecific variation in the response of rice (Oryza sativa) to increased CO2– photosynthetic, biomass and reproductive characteristics

Lewis H. Ziska; Alan H. Teramura

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars of contrasting morphologies, IR‐36 and Fujiyama‐5, were exposed to ambient (360 μl l −1 ) and ambient plus 300 μl l −1 CO 2 from time of emergence until ca 50% grain fill at the Duke University Phytotron, Durham, North Carolina. Exposure to increased CO 2 resulted in about a 50% increase in the photosynthetic rate for both cultivars and photosynthetic enhancement was still evident after 3 months of exposure to a high CO 2 environment. The photosynthetic response at 5% CO 2 and the response of CO 2 assimilation (A) to internal CO 2 (C i ) suggest a reallocation of biochemical resources from RuBP carboxylation to RuBP regeneration. Increases in total plant biomass at elevated CO 2 were approximately the same in both cultivars, although differences in allocation patterns were noted in root/shoot ratio. Differences in reproductive characteristics were also observed between cultivars at an elevated CO 2 environment with a significant increase in harvest index for IR‐36 but not for Fujiyama‐5. Changes in carbon allocation in reproduction between these two cultivars suggest that lines of rice could be identified that would maximize reproductive output in a future high CO 2 environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased photosynthetic rate about 50% in both cultivars, persisting after three months.

Treatment
increased CO 2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
about a 50%e0
Qualifier
after 3 months of exposuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to increased CO 2 resulted in about a 50% increase in the photosynthetic rate for both cultivars and photosynthetic enhancement was still evident after 3 months of exposure to a high CO 2 environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 response suggested biochemical resources shifted from RuBP carboxylation to regeneration.

Outcome
reallocation of biochemical resources from RuBP carboxylation to RuBP regeneratione0
Qualifier
photosynthetic response at 5% CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic response at 5% CO 2 and the response of CO 2 assimilation (A) to internal CO 2 (C i ) suggest a reallocation of biochemical resources from RuBP carboxylation to RuBP regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased total plant biomass similarly in both cultivars.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
total plant biomasse0
Direction
Increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in total plant biomass at elevated CO 2 were approximately the same in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in root to shoot allocation under elevated CO2.

Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in allocation patterns were noted in root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IR‐36 harvest index rose significantly at elevated CO2.

Material
IR‐36e0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at an elevated CO 2 environment with a significant increase in harvest index for IR‐36”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fujiyama‐5 did not show a significant harvest index increase at elevated CO2.

Material
Fujiyama‐5e0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in harvest index for IR‐36 but not for Fujiyama‐5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“at an elevated CO 2 environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

co2 · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 100 positive, 24 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.