Paper · 1993 · Journal of Agricultural Meteorology

Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars

D. Olszyk; C. Wise; W. M. Werakoon

14
claims
41
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To obtain information for more detailed studies of how rice responds to climate change plants of three high tillering (IR30, IR52, IR74) and two low tillering cultivars (Azuceña and IRAT 104) were grown under controlled environment conditions for 28 days. To detect CO2 responses, plants were grown at 400μL L-1 (ambient) or 700μL L-1 CO2, at 31/26°C and a 13hr photoperiod. To detect temperature responses, plants were grown at 28/22, 31/25, or 34/28°C light/dark temperatures, ambient CO2, and a 13hr photoperiod. Across all rice cultivars, a 300μL L-1 increase in CO2 stimulated root growth more than shoot growth (p<0.05), i. e. a 12 to 54% increase in root weight, 4 to 49% increase in total dry weight, and 10 to 32% increase in root/shoot ratio; but neither leaf nor stem weight and leaf or tiller number was affected by CO2. In contrast, increasing temperature by 6°C for 28/22°C stimulated shoot but inhibited root growth, resulting in an increase (p<0.05) (38 to 69%) in leaf number but a significant decrease (32 to 48%) in root/shoot ratio and nonsignificant changes for other parameters. Cultivars responded similarly to CO2 or temperature; there were no significant CO2 x cultivar or temperature x cultivar interactions. However, rice cultivars responded differently to the same environment; IRAT 104 plants tended to have lower dry weights and tiller numbers than the IR cultivars with Azuceña as intermediate. Azucena had lower root/shoot ratios than the other cultivars.The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has been subjected to me Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across rice cultivars, an increase in CO2 stimulated root growth more than shoot growth.

Treatment
increase in CO2e1
Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
stimulatede1
Comparator
ambiente2
Setting
controlled environmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in CO2 stimulated root growth more than shoot growth (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“(ambient) or 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–328 · show in text ↑
e3

“were grown under controlled environment conditions for 28 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 increase raised root weight by 12 to 54%.

Treatment
increase in CO2e1
Outcome
root weighte4
Direction
increasee4
Value
12 to 54%e4
Comparator
ambiente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in CO2 stimulated root growth more than shoot growth (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“(ambient) or 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–328 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 12 to 54% increase in root weight, 4 to 49% increase in total dry weight, and 10 to 32% increase in root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 increase raised total dry weight by 4 to 49%.

Treatment
increase in CO2e1
Outcome
total dry weighte4
Direction
increasee4
Value
4 to 49%e4
Comparator
ambiente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in CO2 stimulated root growth more than shoot growth (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“(ambient) or 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–328 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 12 to 54% increase in root weight, 4 to 49% increase in total dry weight, and 10 to 32% increase in root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 increase raised the root/shoot ratio by 10 to 32%.

Treatment
increase in CO2e1
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe4
Direction
increasee4
Value
10 to 32%e4
Comparator
ambiente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in CO2 stimulated root growth more than shoot growth (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–625 · show in text ↑
e2

“(ambient) or 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–328 · show in text ↑
e4

“a 12 to 54% increase in root weight, 4 to 49% increase in total dry weight, and 10 to 32% increase in root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 increase did not affect leaf or stem weight.

Treatment
CO2e5
Outcome
leaf nor stem weighte5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
ambiente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“(ambient) or 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–328 · show in text ↑
e5

“neither leaf nor stem weight and leaf or tiller number was affected by CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 increase did not affect leaf or tiller number.

Treatment
CO2e5
Outcome
leaf or tiller numbere5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
ambiente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“(ambient) or 700”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–328 · show in text ↑
e5

“neither leaf nor stem weight and leaf or tiller number was affected by CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising temperature by 6°C from 28/22°C stimulated shoot growth.

Treatment
increasing temperaturee6
Outcome
shoote6
Direction
stimulatede6
Comparator
28/22°Ce6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“increasing temperature by 6°C for 28/22°C stimulated shoot but inhibited root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising temperature by 6°C from 28/22°C inhibited root growth.

Treatment
increasing temperaturee6
Outcome
root growthe6
Direction
inhibitede6
Comparator
28/22°Ce6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“increasing temperature by 6°C for 28/22°C stimulated shoot but inhibited root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising temperature by 6°C increased leaf number by 38 to 69%.

Treatment
increasing temperaturee6
Outcome
leaf numbere7
Direction
increasee7
Value
38 to 69%e7
Comparator
28/22°Ce6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“increasing temperature by 6°C for 28/22°C stimulated shoot but inhibited root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–930 · show in text ↑
e7

“resulting in an increase (p<0.05) (38 to 69%) in leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising temperature by 6°C decreased the root/shoot ratio by 32 to 48%.

Treatment
increasing temperaturee6
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32 to 48%e0
Comparator
28/22°Ce6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“increasing temperature by 6°C for 28/22°C stimulated shoot but inhibited root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–930 · show in text ↑
e0

“a significant decrease (32 to 48%) in root/shoot ratio and nonsignificant changes for other parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising temperature by 6°C did not significantly change other growth parameters.

Treatment
increasing temperaturee6
Outcome
other parameterse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
28/22°Ce6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“increasing temperature by 6°C for 28/22°C stimulated shoot but inhibited root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–930 · show in text ↑
e0

“a significant decrease (32 to 48%) in root/shoot ratio and nonsignificant changes for other parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice cultivars responded similarly to CO2 and temperature, with no significant CO2 or temperature interactions with cultivar.

Outcome
responded similarlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivars responded similarly to CO2 or temperature; there were no significant CO2 x cultivar or temperature x cultivar interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRAT 104 had lower dry weights and tiller numbers than the IR cultivars.

Material
IRAT 104e1
Outcome
dry weights and tiller numberse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
IR cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“IRAT 104 plants tended to have lower dry weights and tiller numbers than the IR cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1395 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azucena had lower root/shoot ratios than the other cultivars.

Material
Azucenae1
Outcome
root/shoot ratiose1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
the other cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of CO2 and Temperature on Five Rice Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azucena had lower root/shoot ratios than the other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1486 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 100 positive, 24 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.