Paper · 1991 · Journal of Food Quality

EFFECT OF EVAPORATIVE COOLING STORAGE ON RIPENING AND QUALITY OF TOMATO

R. THIAGU; NAGIN CHAND; E. A. HABIBUNNISA; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions (20°C–25°C, 92–95% RH) were compared with control fruits stored under room conditions (28°C–33°C, 45–65% RH) during summer in Mysore. EC ripened tomatoes on the 15th day reached 100% ripening index (RI) with a value of 2.48 for the ratio of redness to yellowishness (a/b) and hue angle (θ) of 22.1° whereas the control tomatoes on the same day reached a maximum 83.3% RI with a/b ratio of 1.59 and a hue angle of 32.9°. Higher development of chroma and total color difference were exhibited by EC stored tomatoes than control samples. The lycopene content of EC ripened fruits double that of the control. EC stored fruits showed lower values for rupture and shear stresses. The rate of moisture loss for control fruits was 6.5 times as great as for EC stored tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes ripened in evaporative cooling storage reached a 100% ripening index on day 15, versus a maximum 83.3% for control tomatoes.

Material
cv. Rupalie0
Treatment
evaporative cooling (EC) storagee0
Outcome
ripening index (RI)e1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
100%e1
Qualifier
maximum 83.3% RIe2
Comparator
control tomatoese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“EC ripened tomatoes on the 15th day reached 100% ripening index (RI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“the control tomatoes on the same day reached a maximum 83.3% RI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC-ripened tomatoes had a redness-to-yellowishness ratio (a/b) of 2.48 versus 1.59 for control tomatoes.

Material
cv. Rupalie0
Treatment
evaporative cooling (EC) storagee0
Outcome
ratio of redness to yellowishness (a/b)e1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2.48e1
Qualifier
a/b ratio of 1.59e2
Comparator
control tomatoese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“a value of 2.48 for the ratio of redness to yellowishness (a/b)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“the control tomatoes on the same day reached a maximum 83.3% RI with a/b ratio of 1.59”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC-ripened tomatoes had a hue angle of 22.1 degrees versus 32.9 degrees for control tomatoes.

Material
cv. Rupalie0
Treatment
evaporative cooling (EC) storagee0
Outcome
hue anglee1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
22.1°e1
Qualifier
hue angle of 32.9°e2
Comparator
control tomatoese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“hue angle (θ) of 22.1°”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“the control tomatoes on the same day reached a maximum 83.3% RI with a/b ratio of 1.59 and a hue angle of 32.9°”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC-stored tomatoes showed higher development of chroma and total color difference than control samples.

Treatment
EC storede1
Outcome
chroma and total color differencee1
Direction
Highere1
Comparator
control samplese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher development of chroma and total color difference were exhibited by EC stored tomatoes than control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene content of EC-ripened fruits was double that of the control.

Treatment
EC ripenede1
Outcome
lycopene contente1
Direction
doublee1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lycopene content of EC ripened fruits double that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC-stored fruits showed lower rupture and shear stresses.

Treatment
EC storede1
Outcome
rupture and shear stressese1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Rupali) ripened in evaporative cooling (EC) storage conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“EC stored fruits showed lower values for rupture and shear stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of moisture loss was 6.5 times greater for control fruits than for EC-stored tomatoes.

Treatment
EC stored tomatoese0
Outcome
rate of moisture losse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
6.5 timese0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of moisture loss for control fruits was 6.5 times as great as for EC stored tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–882 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 141 positive, 17 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

storage · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.