Paper · 2009 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Response of irrigated wheat cultivars to different nitrogen rates and sources

Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho; Salatiér Buzetti; Marcelo Andreotti; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

High wheat yields require good N fertilization management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different N applications at sowing using Entec (N source with nitrification inhibitor) and urea (traditional N source) at covering, on four wheat cultivars. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design in a factorial scheme, with four replications, at the Experimental Station of the Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira - UNESP, on a dystrophic, epi-eutrophic alic Red Latosol with loamy texture, formerly under savannah vegetation. Four N rates (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha-1) were tested, applied at sowing in the case of Entec and top-dressed 40 days after plant emergence in the case of urea, and the four wheat cultivars E 21, E 22, E 42, and IAC 370. The yield of the wheat cultivars E 21 and E 42 was highest. Plant height and lodging index of cultivar E 22 were greatest, with consequently lowest grain yield. There was no significant difference between Entec (applied at sowing) and urea (top-dressed) in terms of grain yield and yield components. Nevertheless, urea resulted in a higher N leaf content, and Entec in a larger number of undeveloped spikelets. High nitrogen rates influenced the hectoliter mass negatively, affecting wheat grain quality. Grain yield increased under N rates of up to 82 kg ha-1 N, through Entec applied at sowing or top-dressed urea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E 21 had among the highest wheat yields.

Material
E 21e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of the wheat cultivars E 21 and E 42 was highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E 42 had among the highest wheat yields.

Material
E 42e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of the wheat cultivars E 21 and E 42 was highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E 22 had the greatest plant height.

Material
E 22e0
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and lodging index of cultivar E 22 were greatest, with consequently lowest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E 22 had the greatest lodging index.

Material
E 22e0
Outcome
lodging indexe0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and lodging index of cultivar E 22 were greatest, with consequently lowest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E 22 had the lowest grain yield.

Material
E 22e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and lodging index of cultivar E 22 were greatest, with consequently lowest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Entec at sowing and top-dressed urea did not differ significantly in grain yield and yield components.

Treatment
Entec (applied at sowing)e0
Outcome
grain yield and yield componentse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
urea (top-dressed)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between Entec (applied at sowing) and urea (top-dressed) in terms of grain yield and yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea produced higher leaf N content.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
N leaf contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Entece0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea resulted in a higher N leaf content, and Entec in a larger number of undeveloped spikelets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Entec produced more undeveloped spikelets.

Treatment
Entece0
Outcome
number of undeveloped spikeletse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea resulted in a higher N leaf content, and Entec in a larger number of undeveloped spikelets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen rates reduced hectoliter mass and grain quality.

Treatment
High nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
hectoliter masse0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High nitrogen rates influenced the hectoliter mass negatively, affecting wheat grain quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased up to 82 kg ha-1 N with Entec at sowing.

Treatment
Entec applied at sowinge0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
82 kg ha-1 Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increased under N rates of up to 82 kg ha-1 N, through Entec applied at sowing or top-dressed urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased up to 82 kg ha-1 N with top-dressed urea.

Treatment
top-dressed ureae0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
82 kg ha-1 Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increased under N rates of up to 82 kg ha-1 N, through Entec applied at sowing or top-dressed urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.